Literature DB >> 8041745

Central location of the Mu strong gyrase binding site is obligatory for optimal rates of replicative transposition.

M L Pato1.   

Abstract

The bacteriophage Mu genome contains a strong DNA gyrase binding site (SGS) near its center, and disruption of the SGS by deletion or by insertion results in long delays in replication following induction of the appropriate lysogen. To determine if the central location of the SGS is obligatory for its function in Mu replication, we pursued two lines of investigation. First, fragments of Mu DNA containing the SGS were inserted into various locations in a Mu prophage lacking the central SGS. Replication following induction was restored in all of the lysogens constructed, but the observed rate of replication for different prophages decreased with increasing distance between the new location of the SGS and the center of the genome. We also deleted different lengths of DNA from within the right half of a wild-type prophage, retaining the SGS and displacing it from a central location. Replication rates of the deleted prophages were reduced, with larger deletions resulting in larger reductions. Pairing deletions in the right half of the prophage with a deletion in the left half resulted in substantially higher rates of replication than observed with the right half deletions alone. We conclude that the SGS must be located centrally between the Mu termini for optimal rates of Mu replication. These results are discussed in terms of a model that proposes that the SGS is involved in organizing the topology of supercoiled prophage DNA to assist in synapsis of the Mu termini.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8041745      PMCID: PMC44337          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.15.7056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  15 in total

1.  DNA gyrase on the bacterial chromosome: DNA cleavage induced by oxolinic acid.

Authors:  M Snyder; K Drlica
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1979-06-25       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Transposition and replication of maxi-Mu derivatives of bacteriophage Mu.

Authors:  M Faelen; A Toussaint; B Waggoner; L Desmet; M Pato
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.616

3.  On the structure of the folded chromosome of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  A Worcel; E Burgi
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1972-11-14       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Electron microscopy of membrane-associated folded chromosomes of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  R Kavenoff; O A Ryder
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1976-03-31       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Site-specific recognition of the bacteriophage Mu ends by the Mu A protein.

Authors:  R Craigie; M Mizuuchi; K Mizuuchi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Isolation and mapping of Mu nu mutants which grow in him mutants of E. coli.

Authors:  R K Yoshida; J L Miller; H I Miller; D I Friedman; M M Howe
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1982-07-15       Impact factor: 3.616

7.  Tn10 transposase acts preferentially on nearby transposon ends in vivo.

Authors:  D Morisato; J C Way; H J Kim; N Kleckner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  The transposition frequency of IS1-flanked transposons is a function of their size.

Authors:  M Chandler; M Clerget; D J Galas
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-01-15       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Replication of mini-Mu prophage DNA.

Authors:  B Waggoner; M Pato; A Toussaint; M Faelen
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.616

10.  Chromosomes in living Escherichia coli cells are segregated into domains of supercoiling.

Authors:  R R Sinden; D E Pettijohn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  12 in total

1.  My life with Mu.

Authors:  Ariane Toussaint
Journal:  Bacteriophage       Date:  2015-04-28

2.  Measuring chromosome dynamics on different time scales using resolvases with varying half-lives.

Authors:  Richard A Stein; Shuang Deng; N Patrick Higgins
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.501

3.  Characterization of Mu prophage lacking the central strong gyrase binding site: localization of the block in replication.

Authors:  M L Pato; M Karlok; C Wall; N P Higgins
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Surveying a supercoil domain by using the gamma delta resolution system in Salmonella typhimurium.

Authors:  N P Higgins; X Yang; Q Fu; J R Roth
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 5.  DNA gyrase, topoisomerase IV, and the 4-quinolones.

Authors:  K Drlica; X Zhao
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 11.056

6.  Replacement of the bacteriophage Mu strong gyrase site and effect on Mu DNA replication.

Authors:  M L Pato; M Banerjee
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Immunity of replicating Mu to self-integration: a novel mechanism employing MuB protein.

Authors:  Jun Ge; Zheng Lou; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2010-02-01

8.  Dissection of the bacteriophage Mu strong gyrase site (SGS): significance of the SGS right arm in Mu biology and DNA gyrase mechanism.

Authors:  Mark Oram; Andrew A Travers; Alison J Howells; Anthony Maxwell; Martin L Pato
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Transposition Behavior Revealed by High-Resolution Description of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Saltovirus Integration Sites.

Authors:  Gilles Vergnaud; Cédric Midoux; Yann Blouin; Maria Bourkaltseva; Victor Krylov; Christine Pourcel
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 5.048

10.  Transposable prophage Mu is organized as a stable chromosomal domain of E. coli.

Authors:  Rudra P Saha; Zheng Lou; Luke Meng; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.