Literature DB >> 7592347

Characterization of Mu prophage lacking the central strong gyrase binding site: localization of the block in replication.

M L Pato1, M Karlok, C Wall, N P Higgins.   

Abstract

Bacteriophage Mu contains an unusually strong DNA gyrase binding site (SGS), located near the center of its genome, that is required for efficient Mu DNA replication (M. L. Pato, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:7056-7060, 1994; M. L. Pato, M. M. Howe, and N. P. Higgins, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:8716-8720, 1990). Replication of wild-type Mu initiates about 10 min after induction of a lysogen, while replication in the absence of the SGS is delayed about an hour. To determine which step in the replication pathway is blocked in the absence of the SGS, we inactivated the SGS by deletion and by insertion and studied the effects of these alterations on various stages of Mu DNA replication. Following induction in the absence of a functional SGS, early transcription and synthesis of the Mu-encoded replication proteins occurred normally. However, neither strand transfer nor cleavage at the Mu genome termini could be detected 40 min after induction. The data are most consistent with a requirement for the SGS in the efficient synapsis of the Mu prophage termini to form a separate chromosomal domain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7592347      PMCID: PMC177422          DOI: 10.1128/jb.177.20.5937-5942.1995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  32 in total

1.  A DNA gyrase-binding site at the center of the bacteriophage Mu genome is required for efficient replicative transposition.

Authors:  M L Pato; M M Howe; N P Higgins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Efficient Mu transposition requires interaction of transposase with a DNA sequence at the Mu operator: implications for regulation.

Authors:  M Mizuuchi; K Mizuuchi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-07-28       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Interaction of distinct domains in Mu transposase with Mu DNA ends and an internal transpositional enhancer.

Authors:  P C Leung; D B Teplow; R M Harshey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-04-20       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Transpososomes: stable protein-DNA complexes involved in the in vitro transposition of bacteriophage Mu DNA.

Authors:  M G Surette; S J Buch; G Chaconas
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1987-04-24       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  DNA gyrase binds to the family of prokaryotic repetitive extragenic palindromic sequences.

Authors:  Y Yang; G F Ames
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Transposition of Mu DNA: joining of Mu to target DNA can be uncoupled from cleavage at the ends of Mu.

Authors:  R Craigie; K Mizuuchi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1987-11-06       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Transcription regulates oxolinic acid-induced DNA gyrase cleavage at specific sites on the E. coli chromosome.

Authors:  G Condemine; C L Smith
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-12-25       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  The partition locus of plasmid pSC101 is a specific binding site for DNA gyrase.

Authors:  E Wahle; A Kornberg
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  DNA-protein complexes during attachment-site synapsis in Mu DNA transposition.

Authors:  C F Kuo; A H Zou; M Jayaram; E Getzoff; R Harshey
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Action at a distance in Mu DNA transposition: an enhancer-like element is the site of action of supercoiling relief activity by integration host factor (IHF).

Authors:  M G Surette; B D Lavoie; G Chaconas
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Handoff from recombinase to replisome: insights from transposition.

Authors:  H Nakai; V Doseeva; J M Jones
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Measuring chromosome dynamics on different time scales using resolvases with varying half-lives.

Authors:  Richard A Stein; Shuang Deng; N Patrick Higgins
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.501

3.  Surveying a supercoil domain by using the gamma delta resolution system in Salmonella typhimurium.

Authors:  N P Higgins; X Yang; Q Fu; J R Roth
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 4.  DNA gyrase, topoisomerase IV, and the 4-quinolones.

Authors:  K Drlica; X Zhao
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 11.056

5.  Replacement of the bacteriophage Mu strong gyrase site and effect on Mu DNA replication.

Authors:  M L Pato; M Banerjee
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Deep sequencing reveals new roles for MuB in transposition immunity and target-capture, and redefines the insular Ter region of E. coli.

Authors:  David M Walker; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2020-07-09

7.  Immunity of replicating Mu to self-integration: a novel mechanism employing MuB protein.

Authors:  Jun Ge; Zheng Lou; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2010-02-01

8.  Transposition Behavior Revealed by High-Resolution Description of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Saltovirus Integration Sites.

Authors:  Gilles Vergnaud; Cédric Midoux; Yann Blouin; Maria Bourkaltseva; Victor Krylov; Christine Pourcel
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 5.048

9.  Transposable prophage Mu is organized as a stable chromosomal domain of E. coli.

Authors:  Rudra P Saha; Zheng Lou; Luke Meng; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 5.917

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.