Literature DB >> 8041743

Differentiation between binding sites for angiotensin II and nonpeptide antagonists on the angiotensin II type 1 receptors.

H T Schambye1, S A Hjorth, D J Bergsma, G Sathe, T W Schwartz.   

Abstract

To characterize binding sites for nonpeptide angiotensin antagonists on the human angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AT1 receptor) we have systematically exchanged segments of the human receptor with corresponding segments from a homologous Xenopus laevis receptor, which does not bind the nonpeptide compounds. Substitution of transmembrane segment VII of the human AT1 receptor dramatically reduced the binding affinity of all of the 11 nonpeptide antagonists tested (55- to > 2000-fold) with no effect on the binding of angiotensin. The affinity for the nonpeptide compounds decreased additionally one order of magnitude when transmembrane segment VI and the connecting extracellular loop 3 from the Xenopus receptor were also introduced into the human AT1 receptor. Exchanges of smaller segments and single residues in transmembrane segments VI and VII and extracellular loop 3 revealed that the binding of nonpeptide antagonists was dependent on nonconserved residues located deep within the transmembrane segments VI and VII, in particular Asn295 in transmembrane segment VII. Surprisingly, all exchanges in transmembrane segment VII, including the Asn295 to Ser substitution, had a more pronounced effect on the binding of the competitive antagonists relative to the insurmountable antagonists. It is concluded that the binding mode for peptide and nonpeptide ligands on the AT1 receptor is rather different and that competitive and insurmountable antagonists presumably bind to overlapping but distinct sites located in transmembrane segments VI and VII.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8041743      PMCID: PMC44335          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.15.7046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  27 in total

1.  In vitro pharmacology of a nonpeptidic angiotensin II receptor antagonist, SC-51316.

Authors:  G M Olins; V M Corpus; E G McMahon; M A Palomo; J R Schuh; D J Blehm; H C Huang; D B Reitz; R E Manning; E H Blaine
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  Cloning and characterization of a human angiotensin II type 1 receptor.

Authors:  D J Bergsma; C Ellis; C Kumar; P Nuthulaganti; H Kersten; N Elshourbagy; E Griffin; J M Stadel; N Aiyar
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1992-03-31       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Different types of receptor interaction of peptide and nonpeptide angiotensin II antagonists revealed by receptor binding and functional studies.

Authors:  W Wienen; A B Mauz; J C Van Meel; M Entzeroth
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.436

4.  In vitro pharmacology of L-158,809, a new highly potent and selective angiotensin II receptor antagonist.

Authors:  R S Chang; P K Siegl; B V Clineschmidt; N B Mantlo; P K Chakravarty; W J Greenlee; A A Patchett; V J Lotti
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.030

5.  Differential structural requirements for specific binding of nonpeptide and peptide antagonists to the AT1 angiotensin receptor. Identification of amino acid residues that determine binding of the antihypertensive drug losartan.

Authors:  H Ji; M Leung; Y Zhang; K J Catt; K Sandberg
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-06-17       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Opioid receptor activity of GI 87084B, a novel ultra-short acting analgesic, in isolated tissues.

Authors:  M K James; P L Feldman; S V Schuster; J M Bilotta; M F Brackeen; H J Leighton
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Characterization of BIBS 39 and BIBS 222: two new nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists.

Authors:  J Zhang; M Entzeroth; W Wienen; J C Van Meel
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1992-07-21       Impact factor: 4.432

8.  Nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists: the discovery of a series of N-(biphenylylmethyl)imidazoles as potent, orally active antihypertensives.

Authors:  D J Carini; J V Duncia; P E Aldrich; A T Chiu; A L Johnson; M E Pierce; W A Price; J B Santella; G J Wells; R R Wexler
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  New nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists. 2. Synthesis, biological properties, and structure-activity relationships of 2-alkyl-4-(biphenylylmethoxy)quinoline derivatives.

Authors:  R H Bradbury; C P Allott; M Dennis; E Fisher; J S Major; B B Masek; A A Oldham; R J Pearce; N Rankine; J M Revill
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1992-10-30       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  Novel angiotensin II antagonists distinguish amphibian from mammalian angiotensin II receptors expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes.

Authors:  H Ji; K Sandberg; K J Catt
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.436

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. XCIX. Angiotensin Receptors: Interpreters of Pathophysiological Angiotensinergic Stimuli [corrected].

Authors:  Sadashiva S Karnik; Hamiyet Unal; Jacqueline R Kemp; Kalyan C Tirupula; Satoru Eguchi; Patrick M L Vanderheyden; Walter G Thomas
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 25.468

2.  Ligand-specific conformation of extracellular loop-2 in the angiotensin II type 1 receptor.

Authors:  Hamiyet Unal; Rajaganapathi Jagannathan; Manjunatha B Bhat; Sadashiva S Karnik
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Understanding the hysteresis loop conundrum in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships.

Authors:  Christopher Louizos; Jaime A Yáñez; M Laird Forrest; Neal M Davies
Journal:  J Pharm Pharm Sci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.327

4.  Small-molecule agonists for the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor.

Authors:  Lotte Bjerre Knudsen; Dan Kiel; Min Teng; Carsten Behrens; Dilip Bhumralkar; János T Kodra; Jens J Holst; Claus B Jeppesen; Michael D Johnson; Johannes Cornelis de Jong; Anker Steen Jorgensen; Tim Kercher; Jarek Kostrowicki; Peter Madsen; Preben H Olesen; Jacob S Petersen; Fritz Poulsen; Ulla G Sidelmann; Jeppe Sturis; Larry Truesdale; John May; Jesper Lau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Receptors and G proteins as primary components of transmembrane signal transduction. Part 1. G-protein-coupled receptors: structure and function.

Authors:  T Gudermann; B Nürnberg; G Schultz
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Genetic transfer of a nonpeptide antagonist binding site to a previously unresponsive angiotensin receptor.

Authors:  H Ji; W Zheng; Y Zhang; K J Catt; K Sandberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A computer modeling postulated mechanism for angiotensin II receptor activation.

Authors:  M P Joseph; B Maigret; J C Bonnafous; J Marie; H A Scheraga
Journal:  J Protein Chem       Date:  1995-07

8.  Structure-Function Basis of Attenuated Inverse Agonism of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers for Active-State Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor.

Authors:  Takanobu Takezako; Hamiyet Unal; Sadashiva S Karnik; Koichi Node
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 4.436

9.  Mechanism of Hormone Peptide Activation of a GPCR: Angiotensin II Activated State of AT1R Initiated by van der Waals Attraction.

Authors:  Khuraijam Dhanachandra Singh; Hamiyet Unal; Russell Desnoyer; Sadashiva S Karnik
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Functional interaction between losartan and central tachykinin NK3 receptors in the conscious rat.

Authors:  P Picard; L Chrétien; R Couture
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 8.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.