Literature DB >> 7568109

Genetic transfer of a nonpeptide antagonist binding site to a previously unresponsive angiotensin receptor.

H Ji1, W Zheng, Y Zhang, K J Catt, K Sandberg.   

Abstract

Mutational analysis based on the pharmacological differences between mammalian and amphibian angiotensin II receptors (AT receptors) previously identified 7 aa residues located in transmembrane domains (TMs) III (Val-108), IV (Ala-163), V (Pro-192, Thr-198), VI (Ser-252), and VII (Leu-300, Phe-301) of the rat AT receptor type 1b (rAT1b receptor) that significantly influenced binding of the nonpeptide antagonist Losartan. Further studies have shown that an additional 6 residues in the rAT1b receptor TMs II (Ala-73), III (Ser-109, Ala-114, Ser-115), VI (Phe-248), and VII (Asn-295) are important in Losartan binding. The 13 residues required for Losartan binding in the mammalian receptor were exchanged for the corresponding amino acids in the Xenopus AT receptor type a (xATa receptor) to generate a mutant amphibian receptor that bound Losartan with the same affinity as the rAT1b receptor (Losartan IC50 values: rAT1b, 2.2 +/- 0.2 nM: xATa, > 50 microM; mutant, 2.0 +/- 0.1 nM). To our knowledge, this is the first report of a gain-of-function mutant in which the residues crucial to formation of a ligand binding site in a mammalian peptide hormone receptor were transferred to a previously unresponsive receptor by site-directed mutagenesis. Ala substitutions and comparison of mammalian and amphibian combinatorial mutants indicated that TM III in the rAT1b receptor plays a key role in Losartan binding. Identification of residues involved in nonpeptide ligand binding will facilitate studies aimed at elucidating the chemical basis for ligand recognition in the AT receptor and peptide hormone receptors in general.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7568109      PMCID: PMC40960          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.92.20.9240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  26 in total

1.  Amino acids of the third transmembrane domain of the AT1A angiotensin II receptor are involved in the differential recognition of peptide and nonpeptide ligands.

Authors:  T Groblewski; B Maigret; S Nouet; R Larguier; C Lombard; J C Bonnafous; J Marie
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1995-04-06       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 2.  Locating ligand-binding sites in 7TM receptors by protein engineering.

Authors:  T W Schwartz
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 9.740

Review 3.  Structure and function of G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  C D Strader; T M Fong; M R Tota; D Underwood; R A Dixon
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 23.643

4.  Structural model of antagonist and agonist binding to the angiotensin II, AT1 subtype, G protein coupled receptor.

Authors:  D J Underwood; C D Strader; R Rivero; A A Patchett; W Greenlee; K Prendergast
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  1994-12

5.  Structural basis of beta-adrenergic receptor function.

Authors:  C D Strader; I S Sigal; R A Dixon
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Lysine 182 of endothelin B receptor modulates agonist selectivity and antagonist affinity: evidence for the overlap of peptide and non-peptide ligand binding sites.

Authors:  J A Lee; J A Brinkmann; E D Longton; C E Peishoff; M A Lago; J D Leber; R D Cousins; A Gao; J M Stadel; C S Kumar
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1994-12-06       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Identification of peptide binding residues in the extracellular domains of the AT1 receptor.

Authors:  S A Hjorth; H T Schambye; W J Greenlee; T W Schwartz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-12-09       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Conversion of antagonist-binding site to metal-ion site in the tachykinin NK-1 receptor.

Authors:  C E Elling; S M Nielsen; T W Schwartz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-03-02       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Tetrazole and carboxylate groups of angiotensin receptor antagonists bind to the same subsite by different mechanisms.

Authors:  K Noda; Y Saad; A Kinoshita; T P Boyle; R M Graham; A Husain; S S Karnik
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-02-03       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Mutations along transmembrane segment II of the NK-1 receptor affect substance P competition with non-peptide antagonists but not substance P binding.

Authors:  M M Rosenkilde; M Cahir; U Gether; S A Hjorth; T W Schwartz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-11-11       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  8 in total

1.  Prediction of the odorant binding site of olfactory receptor proteins by human-mouse comparisons.

Authors:  Orna Man; Yoav Gilad; Doron Lancet
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 2.  Molecular basis of drug interaction with L-type Ca2+ channels.

Authors:  J Mitterdorfer; M Grabner; R L Kraus; S Hering; H Prinz; H Glossmann; J Striessnig
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.945

3.  Functional diversity of AT2 receptor orthologues in closely related species.

Authors:  Ying-Hong Feng; Lingyin Zhou; Yan Sun; Janice G Douglas
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  Structure-Function Basis of Attenuated Inverse Agonism of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers for Active-State Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor.

Authors:  Takanobu Takezako; Hamiyet Unal; Sadashiva S Karnik; Koichi Node
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 4.436

5.  Interaction of biphenylimidazole and imidazoleacrylic acid nonpeptide antagonists with valine 108 in TM III of the AT1 angiotensin receptor.

Authors:  V Nirula; W Zheng; R Sothinathan; K Sandberg
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 6.  Current topics in angiotensin II type 1 receptor research: Focus on inverse agonism, receptor dimerization and biased agonism.

Authors:  Takanobu Takezako; Hamiyet Unal; Sadashiva S Karnik; Koichi Node
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 7.658

7.  Angiotensin type 1 receptor resistance to blockade in the opossum proximal tubule cell due to variations in the binding pocket.

Authors:  Ravi Nistala; Bradley T Andresen; Lakshmi Pulakat; Alex Meuth; Catherine Sinak; Chirag Mandavia; Thomas Thekkumkara; Robert C Speth; Adam Whaley-Connell; James R Sowers
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2013-02-06

8.  In silico prediction of ARB resistance: A first step in creating personalized ARB therapy.

Authors:  Shane D Anderson; Asna Tabassum; Jae Kyung Yeon; Garima Sharma; Priscilla Santos; Tik Hang Soong; Yin Win Thu; Isaac Nies; Tomomi Kurita; Andrew Chandler; Abdelaziz Alsamarah; Rhye-Samuel Kanassatega; Yun L Luo; Wesley M Botello-Smith; Bradley T Andresen
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.475

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.