Literature DB >> 8039360

Young children's naive theory of biology.

G Hatano1, K Inagaki.   

Abstract

This article aimed at investigating the nature of young children's naive theory of biology by reviewing a large number of studies conducted in our laboratories. More specifically, we tried to answer the following five critical questions. What components does young children's knowledge system for biological phenomena (or naive biology) have? What functions does it have in children's lives? How is it acquired in ontogenesis? How does its early version change as children grow older? Is it universal across cultures and through history? We propose that young children's biological knowledge system has at least three components, that is, knowledge needed to specify the target objects of biology, ways of inferring attributes or behaviors of biological kinds, and a non-intentional causal explanatory framework, and that these three constitute a form of biology, which is adaptive in children's lives. We also claim that the core of naive biology is acquired based on specific cognitive constraints as well as the general mechanism of personification and the resultant vitalistic causality, but it is differently instantiated and elaborated through activity-based experiences in the surrounding culture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8039360     DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90027-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  12 in total

1.  Preschool ontology: The role of beliefs about category boundaries in early categorization.

Authors:  Marjorie Rhodes; Susan A Gelman; J Christopher Karuza
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2014-01-01

2.  Young infants have biological expectations about animals.

Authors:  Peipei Setoh; Di Wu; Renée Baillargeon; Rochel Gelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Human-centeredness is Not a Universal Feature of Young Children's Reasoning: Culture and Experience Matter When Reasoning About Biological Entities.

Authors:  Douglas Medin; Sandra Waxman; Jennie Woodring; Karen Washinawatok
Journal:  Cogn Dev       Date:  2010-07

4.  Darwin's tales-A content analysis of how evolution is presented in children's books.

Authors:  Isabell K Adler; Daniela Fiedler; Ute Harms
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  To What Extent Is General Intelligence Relevant to Causal Reasoning? A Developmental Study.

Authors:  Selma Dündar-Coecke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-06

6.  Generic Language Use Reveals Domain Differences in Children's Expectations about Animal and Artifact Categories.

Authors:  Amanda C Brandone; Susan A Gelman
Journal:  Cogn Dev       Date:  2013-01

7.  Developmental "roots" in mature biological knowledge.

Authors:  Robert F Goldberg; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-04

8.  Five-year-olds' beliefs about the discreteness of category boundaries for animals and artifacts.

Authors:  Marjorie Rhodes; Susan A Gelman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

9.  A developmental examination of the conceptual structure of animal, artifact, and human social categories across two cultural contexts.

Authors:  Marjorie Rhodes; Susan A Gelman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Traits or Circumstances? Children's Explanations of Positive and Negative Behavioral Outcomes.

Authors:  Janet J Boseovski
Journal:  Cogn Dev       Date:  2021-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.