Literature DB >> 8038166

Converting trypsin to chymotrypsin: ground-state binding does not determine substrate specificity.

L Hedstrom1, S Farr-Jones, C A Kettner, W J Rutter.   

Abstract

Rat trypsin II has been converted to a protease with chymotrypsin-like substrate specificity [Hedstrom, L., et al. (1994) Biochemistry (preceding paper in this issue)]. The key alteration in this conversion is the exchange of two surface loops for the analogous loops of chymotrypsin. k(inact)/Ki for the inactivation of chymotrypsin, trypsin, a trypsin mutant with poor activity (D189S), and the chymotrypsin-like mutants Tr-->Ch[S1+L1+L2] and Tr-->Ch[S1+L1+L2+Y172W] by Suc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-chloromethylketone correlates with kcat/Km for hydrolysis of Suc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-AMC. k(inact)'s for the inactivation of Tr-->Ch[S1+L1+L2] and Tr-->Ch[S1+L1+L2+Y172W] are comparable to that of chymotrypsin, while Ki's were much higher. Ki for the inhibition of these enzymes by the transition-state analog MeOSuc-Ala-Ala-Pro-boro-Phe also correlates with kcat/Km for hydrolysis of Suc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-AMC. These results suggest that the surface loops stabilize the transition state for hydrolysis of chymotrypsin substrates by improving the orientation of bound substrates relative to the catalytic residues. Lastly, trypsin and chymotrypsin have comparable affinities for proflavin, while the Kd for the Tr-->Ch[S1+L1+L2+Y172W]-proflavin complex is 10-fold higher. No proflavin binding could be observed for either D189S or Tr-->Ch-[S1+L1+L2], which suggests that the S1 binding pockets of these two mutant enzymes are deformed. This work confirms that enzyme specificity is expressed in the chemical steps of the reaction rather than in substrate binding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8038166     DOI: 10.1021/bi00195a018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  12 in total

1.  Trypsin specificity as elucidated by LIE calculations, X-ray structures, and association constant measurements.

Authors:  Hanna-Kirsti Schrøder Leiros; Bjørn Olav Brandsdal; Ole Andreas Andersen; Vibeke Os; Ingar Leiros; Ronny Helland; Jacek Otlewski; Nils Peder Willassen; Arne O Smalås
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Engineering protein allostery: 1.05 A resolution structure and enzymatic properties of a Na+-activated trypsin.

Authors:  Michael J Page; Christopher J Carrell; Enrico Di Cera
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  The crystal structure of a trypsin-like mutant chymotrypsin: the role of position 226 in the activity and specificity of S189D chymotrypsin.

Authors:  Balázs Jelinek; Gergely Katona; Krisztián Fodor; István Venekei; László Gráf
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.371

4.  Redesigning allosteric activation in an enzyme.

Authors:  Sadhna Rana; Nicola Pozzi; Leslie A Pelc; Enrico Di Cera
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Redesign of MST enzymes to target lyase activity instead promotes mutase and dehydratase activities.

Authors:  Kathleen M Meneely; Qianyi Luo; Audrey L Lamb
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 4.013

Review 6.  Structural basis of substrate specificity in the serine proteases.

Authors:  J J Perona; C S Craik
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Heparin enhances the catalytic activity of des-ETW-thrombin.

Authors:  C A Goodwin; J J Deadman; B F Le Bonniec; S Elgendy; V V Kakkar; M F Scully
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1996-04-01       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 8.  Reconstructing Ancient Proteins to Understand the Causes of Structure and Function.

Authors:  Georg K A Hochberg; Joseph W Thornton
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 12.981

9.  Phage-assisted continuous evolution of proteases with altered substrate specificity.

Authors:  Michael S Packer; Holly A Rees; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Measurement of Ligand-Target Residence Times by 1H Relaxation Dispersion NMR Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Thomas Moschen; Sarina Grutsch; Michael A Juen; Christoph H Wunderlich; Christoph Kreutz; Martin Tollinger
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 7.446

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.