Literature DB >> 8038165

Converting trypsin to chymotrypsin: residue 172 is a substrate specificity determinant.

L Hedstrom1, J J Perona, W J Rutter.   

Abstract

Trypsin and chymotrypsin have very similar tertiary structures, yet very different substrate specificities. Recent site-directed mutagenesis studies have shown that mutation of the residues of the substrate binding pocket of trypsin to the analogous residues of chymotrypsin does not convert trypsin into a protease with chymotrypsin-like specificity. However, chymotrypsin-like substrate specificity is attained when two surface loops are changed to the analogous residues of chymotrypsin, in conjunction with the changes in the S1 binding site [Hedstrom, L., Szilagyi, L., & Rutter, W. J. (1992) Science 255, 1249-1253). This mutant enzyme, Tr-->Ch[S1+L1+L2], is improved to a protease with 2-15% of the activity of chymotrypsin by the mutation of Tyr172 to Trp. Residue 172 interacts synergistically with the residues of the substrate binding pocket and the loops to determine substrate specificity. Further, these trypsin mutants demonstrate that substrate specificity is determined by the rate of catalytic processing rather than by substrate binding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8038165     DOI: 10.1021/bi00195a017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  34 in total

1.  The energetic cost of induced fit catalysis: Crystal structures of trypsinogen mutants with enhanced activity and inhibitor affinity.

Authors:  A Pasternak; A White; C J Jeffery; N Medina; M Cahoon; D Ringe; L Hedstrom
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Determining serpin conformational distributions with single molecule fluorescence.

Authors:  Nicole Mushero; Anne Gershenson
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.600

3.  A fluorescence stopped-flow kinetic study of the conformational activation of alpha-chymotrypsin and several mutants.

Authors:  Gert Verheyden; Janka Matrai; Guido Volckaert; Yves Engelborghs
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Trypsin specificity as elucidated by LIE calculations, X-ray structures, and association constant measurements.

Authors:  Hanna-Kirsti Schrøder Leiros; Bjørn Olav Brandsdal; Ole Andreas Andersen; Vibeke Os; Ingar Leiros; Ronny Helland; Jacek Otlewski; Nils Peder Willassen; Arne O Smalås
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 5.  Atlantic cod trypsins: from basic research to practical applications.

Authors:  Agústa Gudmundsdóttir; Helga Margrét Pálsdóttir
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 3.619

6.  Specificity of trypsin and chymotrypsin: loop-motion-controlled dynamic correlation as a determinant.

Authors:  Wenzhe Ma; Chao Tang; Luhua Lai
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-05-27       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Coevolutionary patterns in cytochrome c oxidase subunit I depend on structural and functional context.

Authors:  Zhengyuan O Wang; David D Pollock
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Structure-function analysis from the outside in: long-range tertiary contacts in RNA exhibit distinct catalytic roles.

Authors:  Tara L Benz-Moy; Daniel Herschlag
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Engineering protein allostery: 1.05 A resolution structure and enzymatic properties of a Na+-activated trypsin.

Authors:  Michael J Page; Christopher J Carrell; Enrico Di Cera
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Evolution of a mass spectrometry-grade protease with PTM-directed specificity.

Authors:  Duc T Tran; Valerie J Cavett; Vuong Q Dang; Héctor L Torres; Brian M Paegel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.