Literature DB >> 8038163

Subunit dissociation affects DNA binding in a dimeric lac repressor produced by C-terminal deletion.

J Chen1, K S Matthews.   

Abstract

The reduction in apparent operator binding affinity found for dimeric lac repressor proteins produced by disruption of the C-terminal coiled-coil interaction has been proposed to derive from thermodynamic linkage between dimer-monomer and protein-DNA equilibria [Brenowitz et al. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 1281]. To explore this linkage, we have employed two dimeric proteins, a deletion mutant (-11 aa) missing 11 amino acids at the C-terminus that has diminished apparent operator binding affinity [Chen & Matthews (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 13843] and a mutant (R3) that binds to operator with wild-type affinity in which the C-terminal leucine heptad repeats of lac repressor were replaced by the GCN4 dimerization sequence [Alberti et al. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 3227; Chen et al. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. (in press)]. To avoid the complexities of working at the low concentrations of protein required by the high affinity between the monomer subunits, urea denaturation studies were undertaken to determine the free energy change(s) for dissociation and/or unfolding. Under denaturing conditions, dimer dissociation and monomer unfolding were found to be concerted processes, and the free energy change for the overall process of dimer to unfolded monomer was derived from these experiments for the two dimeric proteins. A monomeric mutant (Y282D) of the lactose repressor was examined to determine the free energy change of protomer unfolding. From the combination of these data, the Kd for -11 aa dimer dissociation was determined to be 7.7 x 10(-8) M, and the corresponding value for R3 protein was 3.2 x 10(-11) M.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8038163     DOI: 10.1021/bi00195a014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  23 in total

1.  P1 ParB domain structure includes two independent multimerization domains.

Authors:  J A Surtees; B E Funnell
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Mutagenesis-based definitions and probes of residue burial in proteins.

Authors:  Kanika Bajaj; Purbani Chakrabarti; Raghavan Varadarajan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The experimental folding landscape of monomeric lactose repressor, a large two-domain protein, involves two kinetic intermediates.

Authors:  Corey J Wilson; Payel Das; Cecilia Clementi; Kathleen S Matthews; Pernilla Wittung-Stafshede
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Single-molecule studies of repressor-DNA interactions show long-range interactions.

Authors:  Y M Wang; Jonas O Tegenfeldt; W Reisner; R Riehn; Xiao-Juan Guan; Ling Guo; Ido Golding; Edward C Cox; James Sturm; Robert H Austin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A synthetic phage lambda regulatory circuit.

Authors:  Shota Atsumi; John W Little
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Role of the lytic repressor in prophage induction of phage lambda as analyzed by a module-replacement approach.

Authors:  Shota Atsumi; John W Little
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Sex-specific and non-sex-specific oligomerization domains in both of the doublesex transcription factors from Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  W An; S Cho; H Ishii; P C Wensink
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  In vivo tests of thermodynamic models of transcription repressor function.

Authors:  Sudheer Tungtur; Harlyn Skinner; Hongli Zhan; Liskin Swint-Kruse; Dorothy Beckett
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 2.352

9.  Homolog comparisons further reconcile in vitro and in vivo correlations of protein activities by revealing over-looked physiological factors.

Authors:  Sudheer Tungtur; Kristen M Schwingen; Joshua J Riepe; Chamitha J Weeramange; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Ligand-induced conformational changes and conformational dynamics in the solution structure of the lactose repressor protein.

Authors:  Marc Taraban; Hongli Zhan; Andrew E Whitten; David B Langley; Kathleen S Matthews; Liskin Swint-Kruse; Jill Trewhella
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.