Literature DB >> 8037294

Gleason grading of prostatic needle biopsies. Correlation with grade in 316 matched prostatectomies.

D G Bostwick1.   

Abstract

The automated spring-loaded 18-gauge gun recently introduced for prostatic needle biopsy provides less than half the tissue of the traditional 14-gauge biopsy, possibly influencing the accuracy and predictive ability of biopsy tumor grade. In order to determine the value of tumor grade in contemporary needle biopsy specimens, we compared grade in 316 biopsies with matched whole-mounted radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens according to Gleason primary pattern, Gleason secondary pattern, Gleason score, percent of Gleason patterns 4 and 5, and nuclear grade. Biopsy grading accuracy was correlated with rates of capsular perforation, seminal vesicle invasion, pelvic lymph node metastasis, serum prostate specific antigen level, prostatic volume, prostatic weight, cancer volume, perineural invasion, DNA ploidy, and pathologic stage. The greatest grading error was encountered with low-grade tumors; there was no correlation of grading error with clinical staging error or other pathologic factors. Significant differences were noted between biopsy and prostatectomy for Gleason primary pattern, secondary pattern, and score. The percent of poorly differentiated carcinoma (Gleason patterns 4 and 5) in biopsies and prostatectomies showed a moderate positive correlation. The results indicate that the accuracy of 18-gauge needle biopsy in predicting tumor grade in the prostatectomy is similar to that reported with 14-gauge biopsies. Based on these findings, we recommend that the Gleason score (sum of primary and secondary patterns) be employed in all needle biopsies, recognizing that the accuracy of grade is decreased in cases with low-grade cancer and small amounts of cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8037294     DOI: 10.1097/00000478-199408000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  34 in total

1.  Improving the reproducibility of the Gleason scores in small foci of prostate cancer--suggestion of diagnostic criteria for glandular fusion.

Authors:  B Helpap; G Kristiansen; M Beer; J Köllermann; U Oehler; A Pogrebniak; Ch Fellbaum
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Knife or needles? A cohort analysis of outcomes after radical prostatectomy or brachytherapy for men with low- or intermediate-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  Christine M Fisher; Patricia Troncoso; David A Swanson; Mark F Munsell; Deborah A Kuban; Andrew K Lee; Shih-Fan Yeh; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 3.  When prostate cancer remains undetectable: The dilemma.

Authors:  Mahmoud Othman Mustafa; Louis Pisters
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-03

Review 4.  Current practice of Gleason grading of prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Gregor Mikuz; Rafael J Luque; Roberta Mazzucchelli; Rodolfo Montironi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  [Regressive changes after short-term neoadjuvant antihormonal therapy in prostatic carcinoma: the value of Gleason grading].

Authors:  R Grobholz; A Riester; C G Sauer; M Siegsmund
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.011

6.  The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Burkhard Helpap; Lars Egevad
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 7.  Morphological assessment of radical prostatectomy specimens. A protocol with clinical relevance.

Authors:  Rodolfo Montironi; Roberta Mazzucchelli; Theodorus Kwast
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2003-01-16       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  The influence of expertise of the surgical pathologist to undergrading, upgrading, and understaging of prostate cancer in patients undergoing subsequent radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Attila Majoros; Attila Marcell Szász; Péter Nyirády; Eszter Székely; Péter Riesz; Attila Szendrői; Attila Keszthelyi; Janina Kulka; Imre Romics
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Correlation between Gleason score of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy tissue.

Authors:  M Cecchi; R Minervini; C A Sepich; C Ippolito; G L Pagni; D Summonti; A Di Benedetto; L Fiorentini
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Digital pathology image analysis: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.