Literature DB >> 8036103

A new temporal illusion or the TOE once again?

L G Allan1, J Gibbon.   

Abstract

Recently, Nakajima, ten Hoopen, and van der Wilk (1991) and Nakajima, ten Hoopen, Hilkhuysen, and Sasaki (1992) described what they believed to be a new illusion of auditory time perception. They reported that the perceived duration of a temporal interval was influenced by an immediately preceding or succeeding temporal interval. The influence of a neighboring temporal interval on perceived duration is not a new illusion, however, but is another demonstration of the time-order error.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1994        PMID： 8036103     DOI： 10.3758/bf03211669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN： 0031-5117


  9 in total

1.  The dependence of time-order error direction on stimulus range.

Authors:  D G Jamieson; W M Petrusic
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1975-09

2.  Time-shrinking: a discontinuity in the perception of auditory temporal patterns.

Authors:  Y Nakajima; G ten Hoopen; G Hilkhuysen; T Sasaki
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-05

3.  On a bias induced by the provision of feedback in psychophysical experiments.

Authors:  D G Jamieson; W M Petrusic
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1976-06

4.  The role of succession in temporal cognition: is the time-order error a recency effect of memory?

Authors:  F R Schab; R G Crowder
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-09

5.  Recognition masking of auditory duration.

Authors:  H J Kallman; S C Hirtle; D Davidson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-07

6.  Time errors and differential sensation weighting.

Authors:  A Hellström
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Feedback versus an illusion in time.

Authors:  D G Jamieson; W M Petrusic
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Contingent aftereffects in duration judgments.

Authors:  L G Allan
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Two presentation order effects.

Authors:  D G Jamieson
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1977-12
  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Situational context is important: perceptual grouping modulates temporal perception.

Authors:  Bin Zhou; Shaojuan Yang; Ting Zhang; Xin Zhang; Lihua Mao
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-09

2.  Consistent chronostasis effects across saccade categories imply a subcortical efferent trigger.

Authors:  Kielan Yarrow; Helen Johnson; Patrick Haggard; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Human Processing of Short Temporal Intervals as Revealed by an ERP Waveform Analysis.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Nakajima; Hiroshige Takeichi
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-06

4.  Duration Aftereffect Depends on the Duration of Adaptation.

Authors:  Baolin Li; Lijuan Xiao; Huazhan Yin; Peiduo Liu; Xiting Huang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-05

5.  Time-Order Errors in Duration Judgment Are Independent of Spatial Positioning.

Authors:  Charlotte Harrison; Nicola Binetti; Isabelle Mareschal; Alan Johnston
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-09

6.  Two attentive strategies reducing subjective distortions in serial duration perception.

Authors:  Franklenin Sierra; David Poeppel; Alessandro Tavano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.