Literature DB >> 528952

Time errors and differential sensation weighting.

A Hellström.   

Abstract

Sixteen pairs of successive tones, with different amplitude combinations, were presented with 16 combinations of tone duration and interstimulus interval. A separate group of 12 subjects was assigned to each presentation condition and made comparative loudness judgments for each of the pairs. Perceived within-pair loudness differences were scaled by a Thurstonian method using the subjective width of the "equal" category as the unit. The scale differences were well described by weighted linear combinations of the sensation magnitudes of the tones in the pairs. The time error can be regarded as an effect of this differential weighting. For the longer interstimulus intervals, the weight of the second tone was the greater, causing the usual inverse relation between time error and stimulus intensity level. For the shorter interstimulus intervals, these effects were reversed. An analysis of the pattern of weights led to the development of two models, one of which is a generalization of Michels and Helson's time error model. The weights could be interpreted as reflecting the differential efficiency of the loudness information from the two compared stimuli.

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 528952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  7 in total

1.  The normal distribution in scaling subjective stimulus differences: less "normal" than we think?

Authors:  A Hellström
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-07

2.  A new temporal illusion or the TOE once again?

Authors:  L G Allan; J Gibbon
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-02

3.  Prior and present evidence: how prior experience interacts with present information in a perceptual decision making task.

Authors:  Muhsin Karim; Justin A Harris; John W Morley; Michael Breakspear
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The influence of prior experience and expected timing on vibrotactile discrimination.

Authors:  Muhsin Karim; Justin A Harris; Angela Langdon; Michael Breakspear
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Two attentive strategies reducing subjective distortions in serial duration perception.

Authors:  Franklenin Sierra; David Poeppel; Alessandro Tavano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Duration Comparisons for Vision and Touch Are Dependent on Presentation Order and Temporal Context.

Authors:  Yi Gao; Kamilla N Miller; Michael E Rudd; Michael A Webster; Fang Jiang
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-23

7.  Time-order-errors and duration ranges in the Episodic Temporal Generalization task.

Authors:  Ezequiel Mikulan; Manuel Bruzzone; Manuel Serodio; Mariano Sigman; Tristán Bekinschtein; Adolfo M García; Lucas Sedeño; Agustín Ibáñez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.