Literature DB >> 8034068

The value of increasing the dose of human menopausal gonadotropins in women who initially demonstrate a poor response.

D L Manzi1, K L Thornton, L B Scott, J C Nulsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefit of increasing the hMG dose in subsequent superovulation cycles for those individuals who demonstrate a poor response on up to three ampules of hMG daily. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Retrospective analysis of all superovulation cycles at the University of Connecticut Health Center. PATIENTS: All women undergoing hMG therapy with IUI from January 1990 until December 1992.
INTERVENTIONS: All patients were initially stimulated with up to three ampules of hMG daily. All patients who did not conceive on their first hMG cycle and demonstrated a poor response to hMG therapy were started on higher doses of hMG in an effort to obtain a good response. A maximum of eight ampules of hMG per day were used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Peak serum E2, the number of mature preovulatory follicles, and cycle fecundity were compared.
RESULTS: The poor responders using up to three ampules daily had a peak E2 of 384 +/- 26 pg/mL (1,421 +/- 96 pmol/L), 1.4 +/- 0.1 mature follicles, and a cycle fecundity of 3.1% compared with an E2 of 900 +/- 83 pg/mL (3,330 +/- 307 pmol/L), 2.7 +/- 0.2 mature follicles, and a cycle fecundity of 4.3% when these poor responders had their dose increased to five or more ampules daily. Those individuals demonstrating a good response on less than or equal to three ampules of hMG daily had an average peak E2 of 1,159 +/- 41 pg/mL (4,288 +/- 151 pmol/L), 3.4 +/- 0.2 mature follicles, and a cycle fecundity of 16.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite significant improvement in peak E2 and the number of mature preovulatory follicles when the hMG dose was increased in poor responders, no significant increase in cycle fecundity was noted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8034068     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56874-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  6 in total

1.  Live birth rates in the different combinations of the Bologna criteria poor ovarian responders: a validation study.

Authors:  Antonio La Marca; Valentina Grisendi; Simone Giulini; Giovanna Sighinolfi; Alessandra Tirelli; Cindy Argento; Claudia Re; Daniela Tagliasacchi; Tiziana Marsella; Sesh Kamal Sunkara
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Does pretreatment with progestogen or oral contraceptive pills in low responders followed by the GnRHa flare protocol improve the outcome of IVF-ET?

Authors:  E al-Mizyen; L Sabatini; A M Lower; C M Wilson; T al-Shawaf; J G Grudzinskas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  The need to step up the gonadotropin dosage in the stimulation phase of IVF treatment predicts a poor outcome.

Authors:  D L Hock; H Louie; R M Shelden; C V Ananth; E Kemmann
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Different ovarian stimulation protocols for women with diminished ovarian reserve.

Authors:  D Loutradis; P Drakakis; E Vomvolaki; A Antsaklis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Treatment-associated serum FSH levels in very poor responders to ovarian stimulation.

Authors:  Peyman Saadat; Cristin C Slater; John K Jain; David E Tourgeman; Frank Z Stanczyk; Richard J Paulson
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Prediction and diagnosis of poor ovarian response: the dilemma.

Authors:  Ahmed Badawy; Alaa Wageah; Mohamed El Gharib; Ezz Eldin Osman
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2011-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.