Literature DB >> 8033099

Preclinical antitumor activity of temozolomide in mice: efficacy against human brain tumor xenografts and synergism with 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea.

J Plowman1, W R Waud, A D Koutsoukos, L V Rubinstein, T D Moore, M R Grever.   

Abstract

Temozolomide, a methylating agent with clinical activity against brain tumors, demonstrated excellent antitumor activity following p.o. administration to athymic mice bearing human brain tumor xenografts. In the early stage s.c. implanted SNB-75 astrocytoma model, a 400-mg/kg dose administered on Day 5 produced 10 of 10 Day 54 tumor-free mice. In later staged s.c. U251 and SF-295 glioblastoma models, a single 600-mg/kg dose produced 9 of 10 Day 86 and 2 of 10 Day 40 tumor-free mice, respectively. In the latter group, a tumor growth delay of > 315% was attained. Similar levels of activity were attained with equal total doses on schedules of daily for 5 doses and every fourth day for 3 doses. A single 40-mg/kg i.v. dose of 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) also demonstrated excellent activity, producing 9 of 10 tumor-free mice in the SNB-75 model and growth delays of 283 and 301% in the U251 and SF-295 models, respectively. Temozolomide was also highly effective against intracerebral implants of the U251 and SF-295 glioblastomas. Administration of either 600 mg/kg on Day 1 or 200 mg/kg on Days 1, 5, and 9 produced 7 of 9 Day 90 tumor-free mice in the U251 model. In the SF-295 model, a single 400-mg/kg dose or three 200-mg/kg doses produced 3 and 4 of 10 Day 90 tumor-free mice, respectively, and prolonged survival by 127%. A single 40-mg/kg i.v. dose of BCNU was more effective than temozolomide in the intracerebral SF-295 model, and less effective in the intracerebral U251 model. The synergistic potential of temozolomide and BCNU in combination was evaluated in an advanced stage s.c. implanted SF-295 model. When temozolomide was administered 2 h after BCNU on a single treatment day, a dramatic synergistic therapeutic effect was observed in two experiments. For example, single agent doses of temozolomide (600 mg/kg) and BCNU (60 mg/kg) and a combination (400 mg/kg + 27 mg/kg) demonstrating equivalent toxicity produced growth delays of 190, 258, and > 492% (includes 5 of 10 Day 51 tumor-free mice), respectively. Analysis of the data by a quadratic dose response model indicated synergism with significance at P = 0.0001 in both experiments. Synergism also was demonstrated by the isobole method. The reverse sequence was more toxic, but at lower combination doses a synergistic effect was still observed (P = 0.0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8033099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  36 in total

Review 1.  Temozolomide responsiveness in aggressive corticotroph tumours: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  A K Annamalai; A F Dean; N Kandasamy; K Kovacs; H Burton; D J Halsall; A S Shaw; N M Antoun; H K Cheow; R W Kirollos; J D Pickard; H L Simpson; S J Jefferies; N G Burnet; M Gurnell
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.107

2.  Combined chemotherapy with temozolomide and fotemustine in recurrent glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Paola Gaviani; A Salmaggi; A Silvani
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Old chemotherapy makes a comeback: dual alkylator therapy for pediatric high-grade glioma.

Authors:  Eric Bouffet; Vijay Ramaswamy
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 4.  Polymeric drug delivery for the treatment of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Scott D Wait; Roshan S Prabhu; Stuart H Burri; Tyler G Atkins; Anthony L Asher
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Initial contact of glioblastoma cells with existing normal brain endothelial cells strengthen the barrier function via fibroblast growth factor 2 secretion: a new in vitro blood-brain barrier model.

Authors:  Keisuke Toyoda; Kunihiko Tanaka; Shinsuke Nakagawa; Dinh Ha Duy Thuy; Kenta Ujifuku; Kensaku Kamada; Kentaro Hayashi; Takayuki Matsuo; Izumi Nagata; Masami Niwa
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 5.046

Review 6.  The combination of carmustine wafers and temozolomide for the treatment of malignant gliomas. A comprehensive review of the rationale and clinical experience.

Authors:  A Gutenberg; C B Lumenta; W E K Braunsdorf; M Sabel; H M Mehdorn; M Westphal; A Giese
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  First-line treatment of malignant glioma with carmustine implants followed by concomitant radiochemotherapy: a multicenter experience.

Authors:  Hans Christoph Bock; Maximilian Josef Anton Puchner; Frauke Lohmann; Michael Schütze; Simone Koll; Ralf Ketter; Ruediger Buchalla; Nikolai Rainov; Sven R Kantelhardt; Veit Rohde; Alf Giese
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Phase 1 study of 28-day, low-dose temozolomide and BCNU in the treatment of malignant gliomas after radiation therapy.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Raizer; Mark G Malkin; Martin Kleber; Lauren E Abrey
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 12.300

9.  Glioma-associated endothelial cells are chemoresistant to temozolomide.

Authors:  Jenilyn J Virrey; Encouse B Golden; Walavan Sivakumar; Weijun Wang; Ligaya Pen; Axel H Schönthal; Florence M Hofman; Thomas C Chen
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-04-18       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Initial testing (stage 1) of temozolomide by the pediatric preclinical testing program.

Authors:  Stephen T Keir; John M Maris; C Patrick Reynolds; Min H Kang; E Anders Kolb; Richard Gorlick; Richard Lock; Hernan Carol; Christopher L Morton; Jianrong Wu; Raushan T Kurmasheva; Peter J Houghton; Malcolm A Smith
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.