Literature DB >> 8032429

Understanding patient-centered care in the context of total quality management and continuous quality improvement.

D S Wakefield1, S T Cyphert, J F Murray, T Uden-Holman, M S Hendryx, B J Wakefield, C M Helms.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Implementing patient-centered care (PCC) requires a fundamental shift in thinking-from how to best provide a wide variety of independent services to how to effectively combine individual service components into an integrated health care experience that meets patient needs and preferences. DISCUSSION: PCC attempts to improve patient care by organizationally and physically moving selected service functions such as basic laboratory, pharmacy, admitting/discharge, medical records, housekeeping, and material support services to patient care areas, thus effecting an organizational restructuring. PCC creates teams composed of multiskilled or cross-trained individuals capable of providing more of the services directly on the patient care unit. Extensive redesign of the basic work processes as proposed by PCC advocates may result in significant changes in employee job scope, task responsibilities, professional autonomy, and reporting relationships. From the employee's perspective such changes may be neither warranted nor welcomed. Therefore, critical PCC implementation issues include obtaining employee buy-in and establishing appropriate incentive structures to facilitate the desired changes. How does PCC fit in with the popular improvement philosophies of total quality management (TQM) and continuous quality improvement (CQI)? Inherent within TQM and CQI is the belief that it is wiser to maximize efforts to design a product or process to be right the first time and to minimize resources devoted to inspection and repair caused by poor processes. PCC builds upon previous TQM/CQI health care efforts by focusing on ways to reduce the white space handoff problem by examining what, if any, changes in underlying structures and processes may be required. In the PCC hospital, TQM/CQI can function as intended, as a methodology for examining and improving the process of care and patient-care outcomes, regardless of internal departmental or profession-based organizational boundaries.
CONCLUSION: For hospitals to remain competitive in today's rapidly changing environment, it is becoming necessary to reevaluate both how they are organized and how their work processes have been designed and controlled. The groundwork already laid by TQM/CQI initiatives will facilitate the more fundamental and long-lasting improvements derived from the redesign of the patient-care unit as prescribed by the goals of PCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8032429     DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30058-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv        ISSN: 1070-3241


  7 in total

1.  A model for continuous quality improvement in small scale practices.

Authors:  H Geboers; R Grol; W van den Bosch; H van den Hoogen; H Mokkink; P van Montfort; H Oltheten
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-03

2.  Use of a customer satisfaction survey by health care regulators: a tool for total quality management.

Authors:  N Andrzejewski; R T Lagua
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Hospital-based patient information services: a model for collaboration.

Authors:  W Tarby; K Hogan
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1997-04

4.  Health care employee perceptions of patient-centered care.

Authors:  Salva Najib Balbale; Stephanie Turcios; Sherri L LaVela
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2014-10-01

5.  The applicability of Lean and Six Sigma techniques to clinical and translational research.

Authors:  Sharon A Schweikhart; Allard E Dembe
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Handover patterns: an observational study of critical care physicians.

Authors:  Roy Ilan; Curtis D LeBaron; Marlys K Christianson; Daren K Heyland; Andrew Day; Michael D Cohen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  PATIENTS' SATISFACTION WITH HEALTH SERVICES AT THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH OF KOSOVA.

Authors:  Naser Ramadani; Valbona Zhjeqi; Merita Berisha; Rina Hoxha; Sanije Gashi; Ilir Begolli; Drita Salihu; Sefedin Muçaj
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2016-06-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.