Literature DB >> 8031975

The natural history of alloplastic implants in orbital floor reconstruction: an animal model.

W R Dougherty1, T Wellisz.   

Abstract

We developed a new animal model to recreate the condition of an open fracture in communication with the maxillary sinus. We then studied wound healing of the sinus wall structures following fracture in the presence of an alloplastic implant. This model is designed to simulate the alloplastic repair of an orbital floor fracture in humans. The New Zealand White rabbit was used as the animal model. Standardized 8-mm defects were made bilaterally in the maxillary sinuses to include bone and mucosa in 21 rabbits. Two different implants were placed in the soft-tissue pockets to obturate the defects, exposing one surface of the implant to the open sinus. Medpor porous polyethylene and silicone implants were compared. Animals were killed at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks and at 2, 4, and 5 months after implantation. Gross examination of the specimens for the amount of mucosal closure and implant tissue fixation was performed. Histological sections were evaluated for bone and soft-tissue morphology juxtaposed to the implant. Complete closure of the mucosal defect was demonstrated with both types of implants. Medpor implants showed both vascular and soft-tissue ingrowth into its pores by week 1. Bone ingrowth was seen by week 3. Closure of the Medpor obturated defects occurred more rapidly than in the silicone group (p < 0.004 at week 4). The Medpor implants demonstrated bone and soft-tissue fixation, and mature overlying mucosa was reconstituted over the defects. Silicone implants demonstrated a fibrous tissue reaction within 1 week of implantation and they never became fixed to bone or soft tissue.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8031975     DOI: 10.1097/00001665-199402000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  8 in total

1.  Reconstruction of the skull base and cranium adjacent to sinuses with porous polyethylene implant: preliminary report.

Authors:  W T Couldwell; C B Stillerman; W Dougherty
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1997

Review 2.  A review of materials currently used in orbital floor reconstruction.

Authors:  David Mok; Lucie Lessard; Carlos Cordoba; Patrick G Harris; Andreas Nikolis
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2004

3.  Delayed Periorbital Abscess after Silicone Implant to Orbital Floor Fracture.

Authors:  Raj Dedhia; Travis T Tollefson
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2015-12-21

4.  Use of a Three-Dimensional Model to Optimize a MEDPOR Implant for Delayed Reconstruction of a Suprastructure Maxillectomy Defect.

Authors:  Anthony Echo; Erik M Wolfswinkel; William Weathers; Aisha McKnight; Shayan Izaddoost
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2013-09-26

5.  Restoration of the inferomedial orbital strut using a standardized three-dimensional printing implant.

Authors:  Jun Hyeok Kim; In-Gyu Lee; Jeong-Seok Lee; Deuk Young Oh; Young Joon Jun; Jong Won Rhie; Jin-Hyung Shim; Suk-Ho Moon
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Calvarial reconstruction using high-density porous polyethylene cranial hemispheres.

Authors:  Nitin J Mokal; Mahinoor F Desai
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2011-09

7.  Custom-Made Zirconium Dioxide Implants for Craniofacial Bone Reconstruction.

Authors:  Marcin Kozakiewicz; Tomasz Gmyrek; Radosław Zajdel; Bartłomiej Konieczny
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Comparison of Resorbable Mesh (Poly L-Lactide/Glycolic Acid) and Porous Polyethylene in Orbital Floor Fractures in an Experimental Model.

Authors:  Ali Mubin Aral; Selahattin Özmen; Safak Uygur; Basar Kaya; Neslihan Coskun; Suna Ömeroglu; Koray Kılıc
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 0.947

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.