Literature DB >> 8031731

Effective energy: a concept of energy utilization applied across species.

G C Emmans1.   

Abstract

An energy system is described in which, in both single-stomached and ruminant animals, the heat increment of feeding is considered to be linearly related to five measurable quantities. For both kinds of animals three of the quantities, with their heat increments in parentheses, are urinary N (wu; kJ/g), faecal organic matter (wd; kJ/g) and positive protein retention (wp; kJ/g). In ruminants the other two, with their heat increments in parentheses, are CH4 energy (wm; kJ/kJ) and positive lipid retention (w1; kJ/g); in single-stomached animals they are positive lipid retention from feed lipid (wII; kJ/g), and positive lipid retention not from feed lipid (wI; kJ/g). Data from suitable experiments on steers, pigs and chickens were used to test the system and to estimate wu 29.2, wd 3.80, wp 36.5, wm 0.616, wI 16.4 and wII 4.4. The values for wu, wd, wm and (wI - wII) allow an energy scale, called effective energy, to be defined for both single-stomached animals and ruminants. On this energy scale the values of wp and wI, together with the heats of combustion of protein and lipid of 23.8 and 39.6 kJ/g respectively, allow the energy requirement to be expressed as (MH + 50PR + 56LR) for both kinds of animal, where PR and LR are the rates of positive protein and lipid retention (g/d), and MH is the maintenance heat production (kJ/d) which can be estimated as 0.96 of the fasting heat production. The effective energy (EE) yielded to a ruminant animal by a feed ingredient can be estimated as EE (MJ/kg organic matter) = 1.15ME - 3.84 - 4.67DCP, where ME is the metabolizable energy value (MJ/kg organic matter) and DCP is the digested crude protein content (kg/kg organic matter) with both measured at maintenance. Alternatively, EE can be estimated as EE (MJ/kg) = GE (d - 0.228) - 4.67DCP, where GE is the gross energy (MJ/kg) and d is the energy digestibility (MJ/MJ) also measured at maintenance. The EE yielded to a single-stomached animal can be estimated as EE (kJ/g) = 1.17ME - 4.2CP - 2.44, where ME (kJ/g) is measured at, or corrected to, zero N-retention and CP (g/g) is the crude protein (N x 6.25) content of the feed ingredient. The system is simpler for ruminants, and more accurate for both kinds of animal, than those now in use. As effective energy values can be tabulated for ingredients, and are additive to the extent that ME values are additive, they can be used to formulate diets using linear programming.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8031731     DOI: 10.1079/bjn19940188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  11 in total

1.  Influence of limit-feeding and time of day of feed availability to growing calves on growth performance and feeding behavior in cold weather.

Authors:  L D Prezotto; T C Gilbery; M L Bauer; A Islas; K C Swanson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Determination of energy and protein requirement for maintenance and growth and evaluation for the effects of gender upon nutrient requirement in Dorper × Hu Crossbred Lambs.

Authors:  Hai Tao Nie; Hao Zhang; Ji Hao You; Feng Wang
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Protein and energy utilization and the requirements for maintenance in juvenile mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus).

Authors:  Igor Pirozzi; Mark A Booth; Geoff L Allan
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 2.794

4.  Phenotyping for Genetic Improvement of Feed Efficiency in Fish: Lessons From Pig Breeding.

Authors:  Pieter W Knap; Antti Kause
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Changes in the growth, ileal digestibility, intestinal histology, behavior, fatty acid composition of the breast muscles, and blood biochemical parameters of broiler chickens by dietary inclusion of safflower oil and vitamin C.

Authors:  Shimaa A Amer; Wafaa A M Mohamed; Heba S A Gharib; Naif A Al-Gabri; Ahmed Gouda; Mohamed Tharwat Elabbasy; Ghada I Abd El-Rahman; Anaam E Omar
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 6.  Methodologies for energy evaluation of pig and poultry feeds: A review.

Authors:  Jean Noblet; Shu-Biao Wu; Mingan Choct
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2021-10-09

7.  Body Condition Score Change throughout Lactation Utilizing an Automated BCS System: A Descriptive Study.

Authors:  Carissa M Truman; Magnus R Campler; Joao H C Costa
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Artificial selection for improved energy efficiency is reaching its limits in broiler chickens.

Authors:  C W Tallentire; I Leinonen; I Kyriazakis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Factors affecting energy metabolism and evaluating net energy of poultry feed.

Authors:  Shahram Barzegar; Shu-Biao Wu; Mingan Choct; Robert A Swick
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Are the energy matrix values of the different feed additives in broiler chicken diets could be summed?

Authors:  Abdallah E Metwally; Ahmed A A Abdel-Wareth; Ahmed A Saleh; Shimaa A Amer
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.