Literature DB >> 8030442

Normalization of spine densitometry.

R B Mazess1, H Barden, C Mautalen, E Vega.   

Abstract

We investigated several transformations of bone mineral content (BMC) and area density (BMD), in particular volumetric density (BMAD), to ascertain the influence on (1) body size dependence, (2) diagnostic sensitivity, and (3) precision. These transformations were examined in a group of 657 normal postmenopausal women and 327 women with osteoporotic fracture. First, expression of results as BMAD removed some of the slight dependence on body size; 21% of the variation in BMC and 15% of the variation i BMD were associated with body weight, but only 8% with BMAD. Second, the Z scores compared with those for age-matched controls for BMD and BMC were -1.85 and -1.71, respectively; the Z score for BMAD was -1.64. Third, the precision error for BMC was reduced by expressing results as BMD (1.1 versus 0.5%); BMAD degraded precision slightly (0.7%). BMD appeared to be the optimal expression for bone densitometry because it provided the best diagnostic sensitivity and lowest precision error; there was a minimal influence of body size on BMD results. This study also showed that osteoporotic women, even in the first postmenopausal decade, had low spine BMD, small vertebral area, and low body weight. Such women may be particularly at risk of crush fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8030442     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650090414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  14 in total

1.  High heritability of bone size at the hip and spine in Chinese.

Authors:  Wei-Xia Jian; Ji-Rong Long; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 3.172

2.  Influence of age and morphological characteristics on whole body, lumbar spine, femoral neck and 1/3 radius bone mineral apparent density in a group of Lebanese adolescent boys.

Authors:  Rawad El Hage; Elie Moussa; Zaher El Hage; Denis Theunynck; Christophe Jacob
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Risk for osteoporosis in black women.

Authors:  J F Aloia; A Vaswani; J K Yeh; E Flaster
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 4.  The vertebral fracture cascade in osteoporosis: a review of aetiopathogenesis.

Authors:  A M Briggs; A M Greig; J D Wark
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Weight, body composition, and bone density in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  S S Harris; B Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  A genomewide scan for quantitative trait loci underlying areal bone size variation in 451 Caucasian families.

Authors:  H Shen; J-R Long; D-H Xiong; Y-F Guo; P Xiao; Y-Z Liu; L-J Zhao; Y-J Liu; H-Y Deng; J-L Li; R R Recker; H-W Deng
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Reference data for bone density and body composition measured with dual energy x ray absorptiometry in white children and young adults.

Authors:  I M van der Sluis; M A J de Ridder; A M Boot; E P Krenning; S M P F de Muinck Keizer-Schrama
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Discrimination of total body bone mineral density measured by dexa in vertebral osteoporosis.

Authors:  A Bagur; E Vega; C Mautalen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Which vertebrae should be assessed using lateral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  M Jergas; M Breitenseher; C C Glüer; D Black; P Lang; S Grampp; K Engelke; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Apparent bone mineral density estimated from DXA in healthy men and women.

Authors:  Selma Cvijetić; Mirko Korsić
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.