Literature DB >> 8029400

Colorectal cancer overlooked at barium enema examination and colonoscopy: a continuing perceptual problem.

A P Brady1, G W Stevenson, I Stevenson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate reasons for missed diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma at barium enema (BE) examination and colonoscopy and determine if standards have improved since a similar study in 1981.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relevant studies obtained within 3 years of diagnosis in 161 patients with colorectal carcinoma treated in 1990 were reviewed.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven carcinomas were overlooked at BE examination and seven at colonoscopy. Fifteen percent of BE examination errors were purely perceptive (ie, the tumor was visible in retrospect). Another 15% were purely technical. Combined perceptive and technical errors occurred in 45% of cases. Interpretive errors (ie, the lesion was misinterpreted as benign) occurred in 25% of cases.
CONCLUSION: Similar reasons for missing diagnoses of colorectal cancer at BE examination were seen in 1990 and 1981, with a high rate of perceptive errors. Double reading BE studies may reduce this rate, and readiness to perform BE examination after an incomplete colonoscopy may reduce colonoscopic "misses."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8029400     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.192.2.8029400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  6 in total

1.  Virtual colonoscopy vs optical colonoscopy.

Authors:  Zhengrong Liang; Robert Richards
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2010-03-01

2.  Three-dimensional MR and axial CT colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for detection of colon pathologies.

Authors:  Rahime Haykir; Serdar Karakose; Aydin Karabacakoglu; Mustafa Sahin; Ertugrul Kayacetin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  The evaluation of rectal bleeding in adults. A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing four diagnostic strategies.

Authors:  Elizabeth Allen; Christina Nicolaidis; Mark Helfand
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Tumor localization for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Yong Beom Cho; Woo Yong Lee; Hae Ran Yun; Won Suk Lee; Seong Hyeon Yun; Ho-Kyung Chun
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Causes of late diagnosis in cases of colorectal cancer seen in a district general hospital over a 2-year period.

Authors:  G J Harris; J N Simson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 6.  Error and discrepancy in radiology: inevitable or avoidable?

Authors:  Adrian P Brady
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2016-12-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.