Literature DB >> 8029205

Protein structure comparisons using a combination of a genetic algorithm, dynamic programming and least-squares minimization.

A C May1, M S Johnson.   

Abstract

We introduce a completely automatic and objective procedure for the comparison of protein structures. A genetic algorithm is used to search for a near optimal solution of the rigid-body superposition of two whole protein structures. The specification of an initial set of equivalences is not required. Topological equivalences in the final structural alignment are defined by a conventional dynamic programming routine, which is commonly used to compare protein sequences. A least-squares fitting algorithm is then used to optimize the fit between the final set of equivalences. We have applied our method to the comparison of ribonucleic acid structures, as well as protein structures. The structural alignments are generally consistent with those previously published. In fact, on most occasions our method defines at least the same number of topological equivalences as other procedures, but always with a lower r.m.s. distance between them.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8029205     DOI: 10.1093/protein/7.4.475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Eng        ISSN: 0269-2139


  8 in total

1.  Structures of F420H2:NADP+ oxidoreductase with and without its substrates bound.

Authors:  E Warkentin; B Mamat; M Sordel-Klippert; M Wicke; R K Thauer; M Iwata; S Iwata; U Ermler; S Shima
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-12-03       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Comparison of protein surfaces using a genetic algorithm.

Authors:  A R Poirrette; P J Artymiuk; D W Rice; P Willett
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 3.  Evolutionary algorithms in computer-aided molecular design.

Authors:  D E Clark; D R Westhead
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Two "unrelated" families of ATP-dependent enzymes share extensive structural similarities about their cofactor binding sites.

Authors:  K A Denessiouk; J V Lehtonen; T Korpela; M S Johnson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  PRO-LIGAND: an approach to de novo molecular design. 3. A genetic algorithm for structure refinement.

Authors:  D R Westhead; D E Clark; D Frenkel; J Li; C W Murray; B Robson; B Waszkowycz
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Crystal structures and enzymatic properties of three formyltransferases from archaea: environmental adaptation and evolutionary relationship.

Authors:  Björn Mamat; Annette Roth; Clemens Grimm; Ulrich Ermler; Christos Tziatzios; Dieter Schubert; Rudolf K Thauer; Seigo Shima
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Crystal structure of the flavohemoglobin from Alcaligenes eutrophus at 1.75 A resolution.

Authors:  U Ermler; R A Siddiqui; R Cramm; B Friedrich
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  GASH: an improved algorithm for maximizing the number of equivalent residues between two protein structures.

Authors:  Daron M Standley; Hiroyuki Toh; Haruki Nakamura
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.