Literature DB >> 8027125

Survivorship analysis of the Mayo total ankle arthroplasty.

H B Kitaoka1, G L Patzer, D M Ilstrup, S L Wallrichs.   

Abstract

From 1974 until the end of 1988, 204 primary Mayo total ankle arthroplasties were performed at the Mayo Clinic. By means of actuarial analysis, we determined the cumulative rates of survival with failure (defined as removal of the implant) as the end point. The average duration of follow-up was nine years (range, two to seventeen years). By applying the Cox proportional-hazards general linear model, we identified two independent variables that were associated with a significantly higher risk of failure: a previous operative procedure on the ipsilateral foot or ankle and an age of fifty-seven years or less. The overall cumulative rate of survival at five, ten, and fifteen years was 79, 65, and 61 per cent, respectively. The probability of an implant being in situ at ten years was 42 per cent for patients who were fifty-seven years old or less and who had had previous operative treatment of the ipsilateral ankle or foot and 73 per cent for those who were more than fifty-seven years old and who had had no such previous operative treatment. We do not recommend the use of the Mayo total ankle arthroplasty, particularly in younger patients who have had a previous operative procedure on the ipsilateral ankle or foot.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8027125     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199407000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  8 in total

Review 1.  Total ankle replacement: why, when and how?

Authors:  Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Federico Dettoni; John E Femino; Phinit Phisitkul; Margherita Germano; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2010

Review 2.  Total ankle replacement.

Authors:  Alexej Barg; Matthias D Wimmer; Martin Wiewiorski; Dieter C Wirtz; Geert I Pagenstert; Victor Valderrabano
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  CORR Insights®: Can a Three-component Prosthesis be Used for Conversion of Painful Ankle Arthrodesis to Total Ankle Replacement?

Authors:  Andrew Haskell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  [Development and clinical application of ankle prosthesis].

Authors:  Pengfei Bu; Chuan Li; Jun Li; Min Zhu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-11-15

Review 5.  Ankle Arthritis.

Authors:  Vu Le; Andrea Veljkovic; Peter Salat; Kevin Wing; Murray Penner; Alastair Younger
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2019-07-19

6.  [Implantation of a Salto 2 total ankle prosthesis].

Authors:  S Lieske; K Schenk; H W Neumann; M John
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 7.  Is end-stage ankle arthrosis best managed with total ankle replacement or arthrodesis? A systematic review.

Authors:  Robert W Jordan; Gurdip S Chahal; Anna Chapman
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2014-08-21

8.  The Top 50 most-cited articles on Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Azeem Tariq Malik; Shahryar Noordin
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2018-03-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.