Literature DB >> 8024456

Do neck incisions influence nerve deficits after carotid endarterectomy?

J J Skillman1, K C Kent, E Anninos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether transverse neck incisions for carotid endarterectomy were associated with a similar or greater incidence of cranial nerve complications when compared with vertical skin incisions, and to assess the patient's perception of the appearance of the incision.
DESIGN: Prospective, but not randomized.
SETTING: A university-affiliated tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS/
INTERVENTIONS: Eighty-five consecutive carotid endarterectomy procedures were evaluated prospectively in 80 patients. Although patients were not randomly assigned, consideration was given to having approximately the same number of patients who had carotid endarterectomy performed through transverse neck incision as through vertical neck incision. Forty-four carotid endarterectomies were performed with a vertical incision and 41 procedures were performed with a transverse incision. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: To determine the incidence of cranial nerve dysfunction (primarily nerves VII and XII) after operation.
RESULTS: The incidence of palsies of cranial nerves VII and XII in the two groups was similar; there was no statistical significance (the seventh nerve palsy, 32% transverse vs 25% vertical; the 12th nerve palsy, 15% transverse vs 20% vertical). Seventy-two percent of the deficits had disappeared by the 3- to 6-month follow-up. Patients expressed a clear preference for the transverse incision (P = .04).
CONCLUSIONS: Although surgical exposure was simpler with the vertical incision, adequate exposure with the transverse incision was always possible. The incidence of mostly temporary deficits of cranial nerves VII and XII was similar. Patients favored the transverse incision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8024456     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420310080014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  5 in total

1.  Is the retrojugular approach safer than the conventional approach for carotid endarterectomy?

Authors:  J Kluk; S Grainger; I K Nyamekye
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  An Alternative Approach to Carotid Endarterectomy in the High Carotid Bifurcation.

Authors:  Ashley Farhat-Sabet; Brittany O Aicher; Besher Tolaymat; Vladimir Coca-Soliz; Khanjan H Nagarsheth; Areck A Ucuzian; Joshua E Lubek; Shahab Toursavadkohi
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 1.466

3.  Patient and observer scar assessment scores favour the late appearance of a transverse cervical incision over a vertical incision in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy for stroke risk reduction.

Authors:  Megan Deck; David Kopriva
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Option for transverse midline incision and other factors that determine patient's decision to have cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  Fabio J R Pencle; Jason A Seale; Amala Benny; Stephania Salomon; Ashley Simela; Kingsley R Chin
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-05-07

5.  Outcomes after Transverse-Incision 'Mini' Carotid Endarterectomy and Patch-Plasty.

Authors:  Sidhartha Sinha; Matthew Fok; Aaron Goh; Vijay M Gadhvi
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2019-09-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.