Literature DB >> 19424749

Is the retrojugular approach safer than the conventional approach for carotid endarterectomy?

J Kluk1, S Grainger, I K Nyamekye.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The retrojugular approach is promoted as an alternative to traditional antejugular carotid endarterectomy. Absence of named posterior venous branches and ease of distal internal carotid dissection reduce time for carotid exposure together with improved distal exposure. However, a higher incidence of local nerve injury and persistent hoarse voice has been reported. We compare the incidence of these and other complications for the antejugular and retrojugular approaches.
DESIGN: This is a nonrandomised retrospective review of prospectively collected data on consecutive patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.
RESULTS: Our 178 patients formed two groups who were homogeneous in terms of sex and age. Mean operative times, patch usage, and general/local anaesthesia did not differ significantly for the two groups. Postoperative complications including transient ischemic attack (TIA), major stroke, or death; hypertension; miosis; and hypoglossal injury were similar for the two groups. However, there was a significantly increased incidence of persistent hoarse voice (p < 0.05) in the retrojugular group.
CONCLUSIONS: Reports of increased incidence of persistent hoarse voice associated with the retrojugular approach to carotid endarterectomy are supported by our findings, which point to a learning curve effect. A randomized controlled trial would be necessary before any strong recommendation could be made for or against the retrojugular approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19424749     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0052-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  18 in total

1.  Retrojugular approach for carotid endarterectomy: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  H A Safar; B Doobay; G Evans; K Kazemi; A Jahromi; C S Cinà
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Does retrojugular route for carotid endarterectomy increase the risk of internal jugular vein thrombosis?

Authors:  V Scavée; S Theys; J C Schoevaerdts
Journal:  Acta Chir Belg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.090

3.  Local neurological complication during carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  M I Aldoori; R N Baird
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.888

4.  MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-05-25       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Cranial/cervical nerve dysfunction after carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  M D Schauber; L J Fontenelle; J W Solomon; T L Hanson
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Incidence of cranial nerve injuries after carotid eversion endarterectomy with a transverse skin incision under regional anaesthesia.

Authors:  A Assadian; C Senekowitsch; N Pfaffelmeyer; O Assadian; H Ptakovsky; G W Hagmüller
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.069

7.  The retrojugular route: the ideal exposure for carotid endarterectomy performed under locoregional anesthesia.

Authors:  E Neri; M Giubbolini; F Setacci; I Baldi; C Setacci
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.069

8.  Retrojugular versus ventrojugular approach to carotid bifurcation for eversion endarterectomy: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  A Stehr; D Scodacek; H Wustrack; M Steinbauer; I Töpel; K Pfister; P M Kasprzak
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.069

9.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.

Authors:  H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Management of vagus nerve injury afer carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  A F AbuRahma; R Y Lim
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis of retrojugular versus antejugular approach for carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  G A Antoniou; D Murray; S A Antoniou; G Kuhan; F Serracino-Inglott
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.891

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.