Literature DB >> 8024133

Cardiac output by transesophageal echocardiography using continuous-wave Doppler across the aortic valve.

P L Darmon1, Z Hillel, A Mogtader, B Mindich, D Thys.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of transesophageal echocardiography for the determination of cardiac output (CO) has been limited to date. We assessed the capability of aortic continuous-wave Doppler transesophageal echocardiography to determine CO (DCO) in a transgastric long-axis imaging plane of the heart by comparing DCO to thermodilution CO (TCO).
METHODS: DCO was determined in 63 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Aortic valve area was obtained from the transverse short-axis view of the valve assuming a triangular shape for the valve orifice. Stroke volume was calculated as the product of velocity-time integral and aortic valve area: stroke volume = velocity-time integral x aortic valve area. DCO was calculated off-line, by multiplying stroke volume with heart rate: DCO = stroke volume x heart rate.
RESULTS: The aortic valve orifice was easily imaged in all patients. Excellent-quality continuous-wave Doppler flow profiles were obtained in nearly all (62 of 63). A total of 109 DCO determinations were performed. Mean DCO was 4.35 +/- 1.18 l.min-1 (range 2.02-7.42 l.min-1), and mean TCO was 4.41 +/- 1.17 l.min-1 (range 2.24-8.94 l.min-1). Very high correlation and agreement were found between the two methods: DCO = 0.94 x TCO + 0.19, r = 0.94, SEE (standard error of the estimate) = 0.41 l.min-1; 95% confidence interval = 0.06 +/- 0.83 l.min-1. Relative changes from pre- to postbypass CO (delta) also showed a strong correlation (delta DCO = 0.93 x delta TCO + 5.4%, r = 0.82, SEE = 17.8%). For CO changes greater than 10%, Doppler was in accordance with thermodilution in 43 of 45 measurements. DCO repeatability coefficient was 0.51 l.min-1.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to thermodilution, continuous-wave Doppler measurements of blood flow velocity across the aortic valve in the transesophageal echocardiographic transgastric view allow accurate CO determination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8024133     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199404000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  18 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy and repeatability of pediatric cardiac output measurement using Doppler: 20-year review of the literature.

Authors:  Michelle S Chew; Jan Poelaert
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Cardiac output monitoring devices: an analytic review.

Authors:  Jahan Porhomayon; Ali El-Solh; Peter Papadakos; Nader Djalal Nader
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Can a NICO monitor substitute for thermodilution to measure cardiac output in patients with coexisting tricuspid regurgitation?

Authors:  Naka Imakiire; Takeshi Omae; Akira Matsunaga; Ryuzo Sakata; Yuichi Kanmura
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 4.  [Measurement of cardiac output].

Authors:  D A Reuter; A E Goetz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 5.  An introduction to transoesophageal echocardiography: II. Clinical applications.

Authors:  D Oxorn; G Edelist; M S Smith
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  Training is required to improve the reliability of esophageal Doppler to measure cardiac output in critically ill patients.

Authors:  J Y Lefrant; P Bruelle; A G Aya; G Saïssi; M Dauzat; J E de La Coussaye; J J Eledjam
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Transgastric, pulsed Doppler echocardiographic determination of cardiac output.

Authors:  A Descorps-Declere; N Smail; B Vigue; J Duranteau; O Mimoz; A Edouard; K Samii
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Superior vena caval collapsibility as a gauge of volume status in ventilated septic patients.

Authors:  Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Karim Chergui; Anne Rabiller; Olivier Peyrouset; Bernard Page; Alain Beauchet; François Jardin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-06-26       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Comparison of cardiac output measured with echocardiographic volumes and aortic Doppler methods during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  O Axler; B Megarbane; C Lentschener; H Fernandez
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-01-23       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  Systematic review of cardiac output measurements by echocardiography vs. thermodilution: the techniques are not interchangeable.

Authors:  Mik Wetterslev; Hasse Møller-Sørensen; Rasmus Rothmann Johansen; Anders Perner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.