Literature DB >> 8022969

Multi-stage proofreading in DNA replication.

R A Beckman1, L A Loeb.   

Abstract

The mechanisms by which DNA polymerases achieve their remarkable fidelity, including base selection and proofreading, are briefly reviewed. Nine proofreading models from the current literature are evaluated in the light of steady-state and transient kinetic studies of E. coli DNA polymerase I, the best-studied DNA polymerase. One model is demonstrated to predict quantitatively the response of DNA polymerase I to three mutagenic probes of proofreading: exogenous pyrophosphate, deoxynucleoside monophosphates, and the next correct deoxynucleoside triphosphate substrate, as well as the response to combinations of these probes. The theoretical analysis allows elimination of many possible proofreading mechanisms based on the kinetic data. A structural hypothesis links the kinetic analysis with crystallographic, NMR and genetic studies. It would appear that DNA polymerase I proofreads each potential error twice, at the same time undergoing two conformational changes within a catalytic cycle. Multi-stage proofreading is more efficient, and may be utilized in other biological systems as well. In fact, recent evidence suggests that fidelity of transfer RNA charging may be ensured by a similar mechanism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8022969     DOI: 10.1017/s0033583500002869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q Rev Biophys        ISSN: 0033-5835            Impact factor:   5.318


  17 in total

1.  Proofreading of ribonucleotides inserted into DNA by yeast DNA polymerase ɛ.

Authors:  Jessica S Williams; Anders R Clausen; Stephanie A Nick McElhinny; Brian E Watts; Erik Johansson; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2012-06-08

2.  DNA synthesis errors associated with double-strand-break repair.

Authors:  J N Strathern; B K Shafer; C B McGill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Extensive, nonrandom diversity of excision footprints generated by Ds-like transposon Ascot-1 suggests new parallels with V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  V Colot; V Haedens; J L Rossignol
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Protoenzymes: the case of hyperbranched polyesters.

Authors:  Irena Mamajanov; George D Cody
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Negative clonal selection in tumor evolution.

Authors:  Robert A Beckman; Lawrence A Loeb
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The absence of the catalytic domains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase ϵ strongly reduces DNA replication fidelity.

Authors:  Marta A Garbacz; Phillip B Cox; Sushma Sharma; Scott A Lujan; Andrei Chabes; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Efficiency of carcinogenesis with and without a mutator mutation.

Authors:  Robert A Beckman; Lawrence A Loeb
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Mutations in the S-Adenosylmethionine Synthetase Genes SAM1 and SAM2 Differentially Affect Genome Stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Kellyn M Hoffert; Kathryn S P Higginbotham; Justin T Gibson; Stuart Oehrle; Erin D Strome
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Evolutionary dynamics and significance of multiple subclonal mutations in cancer.

Authors:  Robert A Beckman; Lawrence A Loeb
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2017-06-09

10.  Mutator mutations enhance tumorigenic efficiency across fitness landscapes.

Authors:  Robert A Beckman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.