Literature DB >> 8020815

Effect of omeprazole and sucralfate on prepyloric gastric ulcer. A double blind comparative trial and one year follow up.

H T Sørensen1, H H Rasmussen, I Balslev, S Boesby, J Boné, A Kruse, S N Rasmussen.   

Abstract

This study compared healing rates, relief of symptoms, frequency of adverse events, and proportion of patients in remission after one year follow up in 104 patients with active prepyloric ulcer during treatment with 40 mg omeprazole once daily or 2 g sucralfate twice daily, using a randomised double blind controlled trial. Healing rates after two, four, and six weeks were (omeprazole/sucralfate) 49%/23%; 83%/59%; 90%/70% respectively. After two weeks, omeprazole was more efficient than sucralfate in relief of daytime and nocturnal epigastric pain, nausea, and heartburn. The proportion of patients in remission after one year follow up was significantly higher in the omeprazole group (p < 0.01). Of the healed patients ulcers recurred in 36% in the omeprazole group and in 46% in the sucralfate group. It is concluded that the ulcer healing rate was higher and symptom relief was more pronounced in the omeprazole group compared with the sucralfate group, and that more patients were still in remission after a one year follow up period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8020815      PMCID: PMC1374890          DOI: 10.1136/gut.35.6.837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  8 in total

Review 1.  Why do ulcers heal with sucralfate?

Authors:  S K Lam
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl       Date:  1990

Review 2.  Future potential applicability of sucralfate in gastroenterology.

Authors:  G N Tytgat
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl       Date:  1990

3.  Cimetidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer: a multicenter double blind study.

Authors:  H J Binder; A Cocco; R J Crossley; W Finkelstein; R Font; G Friedman; J Groarke; W Hughes; A F Johnson; J E McGuigan; R Summers; R Vlahcevic; E C Wilson; D H Winship
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials.

Authors:  P C O'Brien; T R Fleming
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Analysis of duration of response: a problem of oncology trials.

Authors:  T M Morgan
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1988-03

Review 6.  Omeprazole. An updated review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in acid-related disorders.

Authors:  D McTavish; M M Buckley; R C Heel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Effect of omeprazole and cimetidine on prepyloric gastric ulcer: double blind comparative trial.

Authors:  K Lauritsen; S J Rune; H R Wulff; J H Olsen; L S Laursen; T Havelund; L Astrup; F Bendtsen; J Linde; P Bytzer
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Cimetidine in patients with gastric ulcer: a multicentre controlled trial.

Authors:  F Frost; I Rahbek; S J Rune; K B Jensen; E Gudmand-Hoyer; E Krag; J Rask-Madsen; H R Wulff; J Garbol; K G Jensen; M Hojlund; V R Nissen
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-09-24
  8 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Proton pump inhibitors. Pharmacology and rationale for use in gastrointestinal disorders.

Authors:  P Richardson; C J Hawkey; W A Stack
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 9.546

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.