Literature DB >> 8020614

Implications of ancient DNA for phylogenetic studies.

R DeSalle1.   

Abstract

The utility of DNA sequence characters from fossil specimens is examined from a phylogenetic perspective. Four ways that fossil characters can alter phylogenetic hypotheses are discussed. Two empirical examples and a third hypothetical example concerning amber-preserved insects are presented to illustrate these phenomena. Fossil DNA sequences as characters will be affected by the problem of missing data and missing taxa. In general, cladogram accuracy will be more greatly affected by missing taxa and cladogram resolution will be affected more acutely by missing data. Due to these points, an examination of the importance of the phylogenetic question being addressed, the utility of the fossil DNA sequences and the rarity of the fossil should be considered before damage of a fossil is undertaken.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8020614     DOI: 10.1007/bf01921723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Experientia        ISSN: 0014-4754


  15 in total

1.  Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants: an example from the compositae.

Authors:  B G Baldwin
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.286

2.  The phylogenetic relationships of flies in the family Drosophilidae deduced from mtDNA sequences.

Authors:  R DeSalle
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.286

3.  The fossil record and evolution: comparing cladistic and paleontologic evidence for vertebrate history.

Authors:  M A Norell; M J Novacek
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-03-27       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Ultrastructure of 40-million-year-old insect tissue.

Authors:  G O Poinar; R Hess
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-03-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP.

Authors:  Joseph Felsenstein
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Chloroplast DNA sequence from a miocene Magnolia species.

Authors:  E M Golenberg; D E Giannasi; M T Clegg; C J Smiley; M Durbin; D Henderson; G Zurawski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-04-12       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  PCR jumping in clones of 30-million-year-old DNA fragments from amber preserved termites (Mastotermes electrodominicus).

Authors:  R DeSalle; M Barcia; C Wray
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1993-10-15

8.  Phylogenetic relationships of the pipid frogs Xenopus and Silurana: an integration of ribosomal DNA and morphology.

Authors:  R O de Sá; D M Hillis
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Phylogeny of xantusiid lizards: concern for data and analysis.

Authors:  S B Hedges; R L Bezy
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.286

10.  Structure and sequence of the Cu,Zn Sod gene in the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata: intron insertion/deletion and evolution of the gene.

Authors:  J Kwiatowski; D Skarecky; F J Ayala
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.286

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Ancient DNA.

Authors:  Eske Willerslev; Alan Cooper
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Effect of highly fragmented DNA on PCR.

Authors:  E M Golenberg; A Bickel; P Weihs
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Problems of reproducibility--does geologically ancient DNA survive in amber-preserved insects?

Authors:  J J Austin; A J Ross; A B Smith; R A Fortey; R H Thomas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Phylogenetic resolution within the Elephantidae using fossil DNA sequence from the American mastodon (Mammut americanum) as an outgroup.

Authors:  H Yang; E M Golenberg; J Shoshani
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.