Literature DB >> 8020213

Knee laxity in symptomatic osteoarthritis.

M E Brage1, L F Draganich, L A Pottenger, J J Curran.   

Abstract

Twenty-two patients with primary osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee were studied to determine the effects of OA on laxity of the knee joint. Laxity was measured with a Genucom Knee Analysis System. Ten knees had mild OA (> 50% preservation of joint space). Fifteen knees had moderate OA (some preservation of joint space, but < 50%). Eighteen knees had severe OA (no joint space). A group of 18 knees from 9 healthy (asymptomatic) subjects of ages similar to those of the OA patients were used as controls. Compared to control knees, severe OA knees had less total anteroposterior (AP) translation (12.2 versus 6.6 mm, p < 0.025) and less total tibial rotation (79 versus 59 degrees, p < 0.01). Compared to early OA knees, knees with severe OA had 57% less average total AP translation (15.2 versus 6.6 mm, p < 0.01), 31% less total varus/valgus rotation (15 degrees versus 10.4 degrees, p < 0.016), and 26% less total internal/external tibial rotation (80.1 degrees versus 59 degrees, p < 0.007). These data indicate that osteoarthritic knees tend to have less laxity than normal knees, probably because of a combination of contracture of the ligaments and pressure of osteophytes against ligaments and other capsular structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8020213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  19 in total

1.  The shape of the distal femur: a palaeopathological comparison of eburnated and non-eburnated femora.

Authors:  L Shepstone; J Rogers; J Kirwan; B Silverman
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  The influence of coronal plane deformity on mediolateral ligament status: an observational study in varus knees.

Authors:  Johan Bellemans; H Vandenneucker; J Vanlauwe; J Victor
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Gender and age-related differences in axial alignment of the lower limb among healthy Japanese volunteers: comparative and correlation study.

Authors:  Kotaro Tamari; Paul Tinley; Kiyoshi Aoyagi
Journal:  J Jpn Phys Ther Assoc       Date:  2003

4.  Is there a gold standard for TKA tibial component rotational alignment?

Authors:  Erin E Hutter; Jeffrey F Granger; Matthew D Beal; Robert A Siston
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Associations between frontal plane joint stiffness and proprioceptive acuity in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Martha L Cammarata; Yasin Y Dhaher
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.794

6.  Experimental loss of menisci, cartilage and subchondral bone gradually increases anteroposterior knee laxity.

Authors:  Karl Wieser; Michael Betz; Mazda Farshad; Magdalena Vich; Sandro F Fucentese; Dominik C Meyer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Changes in anteroposterior stability and proprioception after different types of knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Delphine Wautier; Emmanuel Thienpont
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Quadriceps muscle activation and radiographic osteoarthritis following ACL revision.

Authors:  Joseph M Hart; Kimberly A Turman; David R Diduch; Jennifer A Hart; Mark D Miller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Lateral soft tissue laxity increases but medial laxity does not contract with varus deformity in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shigetoshi Okamoto; Ken Okazaki; Hiroaki Mitsuyasu; Shuichi Matsuda; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Epidemiology of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Yuqing Zhang; Joanne M Jordan
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.670

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.