Literature DB >> 8019364

Efficacy of hysterosalpingography in evaluating endometriosis.

W K Johnson1, D J Ott, M Y Chen, J A Fayez, D W Gelfand.   

Abstract

Endometriosis is a common disease in young women being evaluated for infertility. Although endometriosis may cause tubal abnormalities on hysterosalpingography, efficacy of radiographic evaluation in this disease is not clear. We reviewed the radiographic and laparoscopic examinations in 50 women being studied for infertility. Laparoscopy was normal in 15 women and showed endometriosis in 35 patients. Endometriosis was staged at laparoscopy using the classification of the American Fertility Society. Radiographic examinations were reviewed blindly and tubal status noted in each patient. Criteria for tubal abnormality included incomplete or absent filling and ampullary dilatation or convolution. Radiographic efficacy was determined by correlating the tubal appearance to the severity and location of endometriosis. A total of 98 tubes were correlated but only 10 (10%) were felt to be involved by endometriosis based on laparoscopic findings. Radiologic sensitivity was 40% (4 of 10) and specificity was 83% (73 of 88). Positive predictive value was 21% (4 of 19) due to 15 false-positive diagnoses in tubes uninvolved by endometriosis. In conclusion, endometriosis, regardless of its severity, rarely causes radiographic abnormalities on hysterosalpingography because of the location of disease in the pelvis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8019364     DOI: 10.1007/bf00203528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Imaging        ISSN: 0942-8925


  9 in total

Review 1.  Hysterosalpingography in the 1990s.

Authors:  I C Yoder; D A Hall
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Diagnosis and clinical presentation of endometriosis.

Authors:  G D Adamson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Peritubal adhesions in infertile women: diagnosis with hysterosalpingography.

Authors:  S Karasick; A F Goldfarb
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Efficacy of hysterosalpingography in evaluating tubal and peritubal disease in 200 patients with infertility.

Authors:  Y M Chen; D J Ott; D E Pittaway; J A Fayez; D W Gelfand
Journal:  Rays       Date:  1988 May-Aug

5.  Hysterographic images of genital endometriosis.

Authors:  J Belaisch
Journal:  Contrib Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1987

Review 6.  Hysterosalpingography.

Authors:  A M Siegler
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 7.  Classification of endometriosis.

Authors:  G A Weitzman; V C Buttram
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Laparoscopic examination of the normal infertile woman.

Authors:  G P Wood
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Endometriosis and infertility: a laparoscopic study of endometriosis among fertile and infertile women.

Authors:  J H Strathy; C A Molgaard; C B Coulam; L J Melton
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 7.329

  9 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.

Authors:  Vicki Nisenblat; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Cindy Farquhar; Neil Johnson; M Louise Hull
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-26

Review 2.  Hysterosalpingography in the assessment of proximal tubal pathology: a review of congenital and acquired abnormalities.

Authors:  Fatemeh Zafarani; Firouzeh Ghaffari; Firoozeh Ahmadi; Malek Soleimani Mehranjani; Golam Shahrzad
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.629

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.