Literature DB >> 1892018

Hysterosalpingography in the 1990s.

I C Yoder1, D A Hall.   

Abstract

All physicians involved in the evaluation and treatment of infertility rely heavily on the information provided by hysterosalpingography. For many years this study has provided images of the lumina of the fallopian tubes that are not available by other diagnostic means, and it also gives the most accurate outline of the uterine cavity. Hysterosalpingography will therefore continue to be a valuable study in the upcoming decade, and it is important now to take account of the many advances in technology that impinge on the execution and interpretation of this study. In this article we first update the continuing debate about elements of the study itself, involving techniques and the choice of contrast material. We also consider surgical advances, such as the widespread use of microsurgical reconstruction of the fallopian tube, that increase the demand for hysterosalpingography. Since radiologists are asked to evaluate the results of surgery, it is essential for them to be familiar with the postoperative appearances of the fallopian tube. Finally, we consider what must be by far the most important development of the 1990s, the continuing integration of hysterosalpingography with new interventional and imaging techniques. Fallopian tube catheterization expands the examination of the fallopian tube and offers new therapeutic applications. Transvaginal sonography and MR imaging have allowed noninvasive exploration of the female pelvis. Correlation of hysterosalpingography and MR imaging is particularly useful in the diagnosis of uterine myomas and congenital uterine duplication anomalies when surgery to preserve or enhance the reproductive capacity of the uterus is indicated. Sonography and MR imaging should be correlated with hysterosalpingography to provide a more efficient diagnostic and therapeutic approach to the common mechanical causes of infertility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1892018     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.157.4.1892018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  6 in total

1.  How members of the Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility and Society of Reproductive Surgeons evaluate, define, and manage hydrosalpinges.

Authors:  Kenan Omurtag; Natalia M Grindler; Kimberly A Roehl; Gordon Wright Bates; Angeline N Beltsos; Randall R Odem; Emily S Jungheim
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Venous intravasation: a potential pitfall of confirmatory hysterosalpingogram following essure hysteroscopic sterilization.

Authors:  Michael C Chang; John J Shim
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2012-09-01

3.  State-mandated insurance coverage is associated with the approach to hydrosalpinges before IVF.

Authors:  Kenan Omurtag; Natalia M Grindler; Kimberly A Roehl; G Wright Bates; Angeline N Beltsos; Randall R Odem; Emily S Jungheim
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.828

4.  Duplication of the fallopian tube.

Authors:  Narayanan R; Rajeev Ma
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2008-01

5.  Efficacy of hysterosalpingography in evaluating endometriosis.

Authors:  W K Johnson; D J Ott; M Y Chen; J A Fayez; D W Gelfand
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1994 May-Jun

6.  Venous intravasation as a complication and potential pitfall during hysterosalpingography: re-emerging study with a novel classification.

Authors:  Abdurrahim Dusak; Hatice E Soydinc; Hakan Onder; Faysal Ekinci; Neval Y Görük; Cihat Hamidi; Aslan Bilici
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2013-12-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.