Literature DB >> 8019054

Perspectives on quality of life of older patients with cancer.

L Balducci1.   

Abstract

Cancer in older people is an increasingly common problem. Since survival benefits may decline and the risks of treatment progressively increase with age, preservation and improvement of quality of life (QOL) is a major goal of geriatric oncology. The concept of health-related QOL holds that the preservation of health and physical function is necessary to the maintenance and improvement of QOL, and encompasses several constructs, including physical, functional, emotional, social, and spiritual domains. Several instruments for the assessment of QOL have been validated, but none has been calibrated to the special problems of older people. Such problems involve diverse evolution of health and disease around variable models, potential age-related shifts in values and focus, and barriers to the use of questionnaires, such as poor visual and auditory function, easy fatiguability, slower reactions and dementia. Individualised questionnaires may represent the ultimate goal in the assessment of QOL in the elderly. The assessment of QOL in general oncology has provided new and important information related to the value of breast preservation in the management of breast cancer, to the value of sexual function in the management of prostate cancer, and to the effects of limb amputation on QOL. Also, QOL at the beginning of treatment has independent prognostic implications. In geriatric oncology, assessment of QOL may allow trade-off between QOL and survival, and may determine the choice among alternative forms of life-prolonging and palliative treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8019054     DOI: 10.2165/00002512-199404040-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs Aging        ISSN: 1170-229X            Impact factor:   3.923


  29 in total

Review 1.  The impact of breast-conserving treatment and mastectomy on the quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients: a review.

Authors:  G M Kiebert; J C de Haes; C J van de Velde
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Diagnosis of illness presentation in the elderly.

Authors:  L P Fried; D J Storer; D E King; F Lodder
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 3.  Cancer in the elderly: meeting the challenge of an aging population.

Authors:  S Monfardini; R Yancik
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-04-07       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Quality of life assessment of patients in extremity sarcoma clinical trials.

Authors:  P H Sugarbaker; I Barofsky; S A Rosenberg; F J Gianola
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 5.  Does (or should) chronologic age influence the choice of cancer treatment?

Authors:  P A Ganz
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.990

6.  How should we measure function in patients with chronic heart and lung disease?

Authors:  G H Guyatt; P J Thompson; L B Berman; M J Sullivan; M Townsend; N L Jones; S O Pugsley
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1985

Review 7.  Measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; D H Feeny; D L Patrick
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Characteristics of women at risk for psychosocial distress in the year after breast cancer.

Authors:  C A Schag; P A Ganz; M L Polinsky; C Fred; K Hirji; L Petersen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Geriatric oncology: perspectives from decision analysis. A review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.250

10.  Patients' and families' preferences for medical intensive care.

Authors:  M Danis; D L Patrick; L I Southerland; M L Green
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-08-12       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  11 in total

1.  Enhancing life after cancer in diverse communities.

Authors:  Judith S Kaur; Kathryn Coe; Julia Rowland; Kathryn L Braun; Francisco A Conde; Linda Burhansstipanov; Sue Heiney; Marjorie Kagawa-Singer; Qian Lu; Catherine Witte
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Mammographic screening in older women. Is it worthwhile?

Authors:  J A van Dijck; M J Broeders; A L Verbeek
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Association of multidimensional comorbidities with survival, toxicity, and unplanned hospitalizations in older adults with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ki Hyang Kim; Jae Jin Lee; Jongphil Kim; Jun-Min Zhou; Fabio Gomes; Marina Sehovic; Martine Extermann
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 4.  When drug treatment in the elderly is not cost effective. An ethical dilemma in an environment of healthcare rationing.

Authors:  R Chadwick; M Levitt
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Vinorelbine: a review of its use in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Monique P Curran; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  Vinorelbine. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical use in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  K L Goa; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  [Geriatric assessment. Is it significantly helpful in selection of elderly tumour patients for a difficult therapy?].

Authors:  S Krege; C Friedrich; G Lümmen; L Pientka; H Rübben
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  Strategies for improving quality of life in older patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz; Patrick Dufour
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 9.  Potential role of oral anthracyclines in older patients with cancer.

Authors:  W S Lasota; D L de Valeriola; M J Piccart
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  Physical and psychosocial outcomes in cancer patients: a comparison of different age groups.

Authors:  E R Greimel; G V Padilla; M M Grant
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.