Literature DB >> 8017651

Pulsatile versus nonpulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass. No difference in brain blood flow or metabolism at 27 degrees C.

B J Hindman1, F Dexter, K H Ryu, T Smith, J Cutkomp.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether nonpulsatile perfusion adversely affects the brain. This study compared cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral metabolic rate for oxygen (CMRO2) betwen pulsatile and nonpulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in rabbits at 27 degrees C.
METHODS: In experiment A, 24 anesthetized New Zealand white rabbits underwent pulsatile CPB at 27 degrees C, using alpha-stat acid-base management. Animals were randomized to three groups based upon the duration of the period of systolic ejection (100, 120, 140 ms) and were perfused for 20 min at each of three pulse rates (150, 200, 250 pulse/min), generating nine arterial pressure waveforms. Arterial pressure waveform, arterial and cerebral venous oxygen content, CBF (radiolabeled microspheres), and CMRO2 (Fick) were measured at the end of each 20-min period. In experiment B, 16 anesthetized rabbits were randomized to pulsatile (120-ms ejection period, 250 pulse/min) or nonpulsatile CPB at 27 degrees C. AFter 1 h, arterial pressure waveform, arterial and cerebral venous oxygen content, CBF and CMRO2 were measured.
RESULTS: In experiment A, CBF and CMRO2 were independent of ejection period and pulse rate. Thus, all nine waveforms were physiologically equivalent. In experiment B, CBF did not differ between pulsatile and nonpulsatile bypass, 30 +/- 4 versus 32 +/- 5 ml.100 g-1.min-1, respectively. CMRO2 did not differ between pulsatile and nonpulsatile bypass, 1.7 +/- 0.2 versus 1.6 +/- 0.2 ml.100 g-1.min-1, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: During CPB in rabbits at 27 degrees C, neither CBF nor CMRO2 is affected by flow character.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8017651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  2 in total

1.  CrossTalk opposing view: Blood flow pulsatility in left ventricular assist device patients is not essential to maintain normal brain physiology.

Authors:  William K Cornwell; Takashi Tarumi; Justin Lawley; Amrut V Ambardekar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  In vitro pulsatility analysis of axial-flow and centrifugal-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  J Ryan Stanfield; Craig H Selzman
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.097

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.