Literature DB >> 8015422

Different conduits in peripheral nerve surgery.

G A Brunelli1, A Vigasio, G R Brunelli.   

Abstract

A considerable amount of research is being undertaken regarding the possibility of bridging loss of nerve substance with different guiding tubes, in order to improve functional outcome, reduce the surgical time, and reduce damage at donor nerve sites. A review of the literature and personal research allows us to state that: for short gaps, biological tubes (autologous veins) may give good results and also allow chemotactic attraction with selective arrangements of motor and sensory axons. Gaps longer than 1 cm do not allow tropism and are associated with failure to support axonal regrowth. Artificial biodegradable conduits still show results that are controversial; they may give good results provided that the material of which they are made is perfectly tolerated. Empty tubes, longer than 8-10 mm, besides being deprived of the chemotactic attraction, may collapse or be partially reabsorbed and replaced by scar. Probably in the near future biological or biodegradable tubes, containing laminin-like substances or muscle scaffold, will allow us to bridge increasingly large defects in nerves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8015422     DOI: 10.1002/micr.1920150307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsurgery        ISSN: 0738-1085            Impact factor:   2.425


  9 in total

1.  In vivo application of poly-3-hydroxyoctanoate as peripheral nerve graft.

Authors:  D Burcu Hazer; Ercan Bal; Gülay Nurlu; Kemal Benli; Serdar Balci; Feral Öztürk; Baki Hazer
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Enhanced femoral nerve regeneration after tubulization with a tyrosine-derived polycarbonate terpolymer: effects of protein adsorption and independence of conduit porosity.

Authors:  Mindy Ezra; Jared Bushman; David Shreiber; Melitta Schachner; Joachim Kohn
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 3.  Nerve repair: toward a sutureless approach.

Authors:  Matthew J Barton; John W Morley; Marcus A Stoodley; Antonio Lauto; David A Mahns
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-07-13       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  A composite poly-hydroxybutyrate-glial growth factor conduit for long nerve gap repairs.

Authors:  P N Mohanna; R C Young; M Wiberg; G Terenghi
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing muscle-in-vein conduits with autologous nerve grafts for nerve reconstruction.

Authors:  Johannes C Heinzel; Mai Quyen Nguyen; Laura Kefalianakis; Cosima Prahm; Adrien Daigeler; David Hercher; Jonas Kolbenschlag
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Peripheral nerve regeneration with conduits: use of vein tubes.

Authors:  Rodrigo Guerra Sabongi; Marcela Fernandes; João Baptista Gomes Dos Santos
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.135

Review 7.  Approaches to Peripheral Nerve Repair: Generations of Biomaterial Conduits Yielding to Replacing Autologous Nerve Grafts in Craniomaxillofacial Surgery.

Authors:  Robert Gaudin; Christian Knipfer; Anders Henningsen; Ralf Smeets; Max Heiland; Tessa Hadlock
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-07-31       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Stimulating effect of thyroid hormones in peripheral nerve regeneration: research history and future direction toward clinical therapy.

Authors:  I Barakat-Walter; R Kraftsik
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.135

Review 9.  [Regeneration - A New Therapeutic Dimension in Otorhinolaryngology].

Authors:  Nicole Rotter; Marcy Zenobi-Wong
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 1.057

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.