Literature DB >> 8014816

Preputial plasty: a good alternative to circumcision.

P M Cuckow1, G Rix, P D Mouriquand.   

Abstract

Since 1991, boys needing surgery for tight nonretractile foreskin have been offered a choice of preputial plasty or circumcision, providing that there is no clinical evidence of preputial scarring. We compared two similar groups of 50 boys that underwent each procedure, through our routine audit and questionnaires sent to their parents. Of the boys with circumcisions, 20% required an overnight stay after the operation; 14% had anesthetic complications, and 6% required reoperation because of bleeding. Only 8% of patients with preputial plasty had an overnight stay, and no bleeding was observed. Parental assessment of both operations showed that morbidity was significantly less and of shorter duration for the preputial plasty group. Two patients in the preputial plasty group (4%) had recurrent narrowing of the foreskin caused by scarring and contraction of the incision. Parents were pleased with the long-term results of both procedures. This simple alternative to circumcision is easy to perform and allows full mobilization of the foreskin, preserving its function and providing an excellent cosmetic result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8014816     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3468(94)90092-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  12 in total

1.  Circumcision : A Time to Rethink.

Authors:  H S Nagar; A Chauhan; V K Saxena
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

2.  A simple alternative to circumcision.

Authors:  M D Barber; W G Scobie
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Circumcision of children.

Authors:  J P Warren; P D Smith; J D Dalton; G R Edwards; M Foden; R Preston; P Stewart; A Roberts; P C Cookson; J Elliott; J S Phillips; J Williams; M Mallinson-Read; I Morris; J Bowring; R Warburton; J Blazeby; T Peters; J Moore; J Stevens
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-02-10

4.  Is preputioplasty effective and acceptable?

Authors:  N J Barber; B Chappell; P G Carter; J P Britton
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 18.000

5.  Circumcision.

Authors:  Poonam Puri; Joginder Kumar; V Ramesh
Journal:  Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS       Date:  2010-07

Review 6.  Preputioplasty as a surgical alternative in treatment of phimosis.

Authors:  Daniar Osmonov; Claudius Hamann; Ahmed Eraky; Almut Kalz; Diethild Melchior; Robert Bergholz; Javier Romero-Otero
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 7.  Electrosurgery use in circumcision in children: Is it safe?

Authors:  Tariq Ibrahim Altokhais
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

8.  Preputialplasty: can be considered an alternative to circumcision? When, how, why? Experience of Italian centre.

Authors:  Rossella Angotti; Francesco Molinaro; Francesco Ferrara; Chiara Pellegrino; Edoardo Bindi; Giulia Fusi; Mario Messina
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-04

9.  Phimosis in children.

Authors:  Sukhbir Kaur Shahid
Journal:  ISRN Urol       Date:  2012-03-05

10.  Predictive Factors of Postoperative Pain and Postoperative Anxiety in Children Undergoing Elective Circumcision: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Nick Zavras; Stella Tsamoudaki; Vasileia Ntomi; Ioannis Yiannopoulos; Efstratios Christianakis; Emmanuel Pikoulis
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2015-10-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.