Literature DB >> 12949202

Is preputioplasty effective and acceptable?

N J Barber1, B Chappell, P G Carter, J P Britton.   

Abstract

Foreskin complaints in childhood, if not manageable conservatively, are usually treated by circumcision. A less radical surgical option, when balanitis xerotica obliterans is absent, is preputioplasty. We sent questionnaires to the parents of 23 boys who had had this procedure and 22 replied. Mean interval since operation was 20 months (range 3-36). The main indications for surgery had been irretractable foreskin in 9, recurrent balanoposthitis in 10 and ballooning on voiding in 3 and the operation had dealt successfully with these in 7, 7, and 3, respectively. In all but one case the parents were satisfied with the cosmetic result. However, in 8 cases (36%) the parents said they would have preferred circumcision and 3 of the boys had been listed for further surgery. Preputioplasty is a satisfactory alternative to circumcision in selected cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12949202      PMCID: PMC539601          DOI: 10.1177/014107680309600909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   18.000


  9 in total

1.  The effect of male circumcision on the sexual enjoyment of the female partner.

Authors:  K O'Hara; J O'Hara
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  A preliminary poll of men circumcised in infancy or childhood.

Authors:  T Hammond
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Dorsal incision of the prepuce and skin closure with Dexon in patients with phimosis.

Authors:  D E Holmlund
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1973

4.  Further fate of the foreskin. Incidence of preputial adhesions, phimosis, and smegma among Danish schoolboys.

Authors:  J Oster
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1968-04       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Lateral preputioplasty for phimosis.

Authors:  T M Lane; L M South
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1999-10

6.  Circumcision in the United States. Prevalence, prophylactic effects, and sexual practice.

Authors:  E O Laumann; C M Masi; E W Zuckerman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-04-02       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  "Triple incision plasty". A convenient procedure for preputial relief.

Authors:  N Wåhlin
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1992

8.  Preputial plasty: a good alternative to circumcision.

Authors:  P M Cuckow; G Rix; P D Mouriquand
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  Prepuceplasty: an alternative to circumcision.

Authors:  H de Castella
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.891

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Acceptability and outcomes of foreskin preservation for phimosis: An Indian perspective.

Authors:  B S Balaji; Tarun John K Jacob; M S Gowri
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-05-31

2.  Preputioplasty.

Authors:  Tim Lane; Marie South
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 18.000

3.  Emergency dorsal slit for balanitis with retention.

Authors:  N Thiruchelvam; P Nayak; H Mostafid
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 18.000

4.  Sutureless prepuceplasty with wound healing by second intention: an alternative surgical approach in children's phimosis treatment.

Authors:  Efstratios Christianakis
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 2.264

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.