Literature DB >> 8013414

Comparison of the hepatic effects of nafenopin and WY-14,643 on peroxisome proliferation and cell replication in the rat and Syrian hamster.

B G Lake1, J G Evans, M E Cunninghame, R J Price.   

Abstract

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were fed control diet or diet containing 0.05% nafenopin (NAF) or 0.025% WY-14,643 (WY) and male Syrian hamsters were fed control diet or diet containing 0.25% NAF or 0.025% WY for periods of 1, 15, 40, and 60 weeks. Both NAF and WY produced a sustained increase in liver weight and induction of peroxisomal fatty acid beta-oxidation in the rat and Syrian hamster. Replicative DNA synthesis was studied by implanting osmotic pumps containing [3H] thymidine during weeks 0-1, 14-15, 39-40, and 59-60. Cell replication, determined either as the hepatocyte labelling index or by incorporation of radioactivity into liver whole homogenate DNA, was increased in rats given NAF and WY for 1 week. However, only WY produced a sustained increased in cell replication after 15-60 weeks. After 40 weeks, liver nodules and tumors were present in WY-treated rats, and these lesions were observed in all WY-treated and some NAF-treated rats after 60 weeks. In contrast to the rat, no marked effect on replicative DNA synthesis and no liver nodules and tumors were observed in Syrian hamsters given NAF and WY for up to 60 weeks. The rat study demonstrates that liver tumors are produced more rapidly by doses of peroxisome proliferators that produce a sustained stimulation of cell replication, whereas the hamster study suggests that species differences may exist in both peroxisome proliferator-induced cell replication and liver tumor formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8013414      PMCID: PMC1519442          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.93101s5241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  26 in total

Review 1.  Peroxisome proliferation and nongenotoxic carcinogenesis: commentary on a symposium.

Authors:  D E Moody; J K Reddy; B G Lake; J A Popp; D H Reese
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1991-02

Review 2.  Biochemical mechanisms of induction of hepatic peroxisome proliferation.

Authors:  E A Lock; A M Mitchell; C R Elcombe
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 13.820

Review 3.  Hepatic peroxisome proliferation and oxidative stress.

Authors:  B G Lake; T J Gray; A G Smith; J G Evans
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.407

4.  Effects of non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens phenobarbital and nafenopin on phenotype and growth of different populations of altered foci in rat liver.

Authors:  R Schulte-Hermann; B Kraupp-Grasl; W Bursch; U Gerbracht; I Timmermann-Trosiener
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.902

5.  Hepatic peroxisomal changes induced by a tetrazole-substituted alkoxyacetophenone in rats and comparison with other species.

Authors:  P I Eacho; P S Foxworthy; W D Johnson; D M Hoover; S L White
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 6.  Oxidative DNA damage caused by persistent peroxisome proliferation: its role in hepatocarcinogenesis.

Authors:  J K Reddy; M S Rao
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  Evaluation of liver cell proliferation during ciprofibrate-induced hepatocarcinogenesis.

Authors:  A V Yeldandi; M Milano; V Subbarao; J K Reddy; M S Rao
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  1989-09-15       Impact factor: 8.679

8.  Relationship of hepatic peroxisome proliferation and replicative DNA synthesis to the hepatocarcinogenicity of the peroxisome proliferators di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and [4-chloro-6-(2,3-xylidino)-2-pyrimidinylthio]acetic acid (Wy-14,643) in rats.

Authors:  D S Marsman; R C Cattley; J G Conway; J A Popp
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1988-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Peroxisome proliferation and lipid peroxidation in rat liver.

Authors:  S K Goel; N D Lalwani; J K Reddy
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Effect of fenofibrate and LF 2151 on hepatic peroxisomes in hamsters.

Authors:  S Pourbaix; F Heller; C Harvengt
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1984-11-15       Impact factor: 5.858

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Hepatic neoplasia: reflections and ruminations.

Authors:  K Aterman
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Liver gene expression profiles of rats treated with clofibric acid: comparison of whole liver and laser capture microdissected liver.

Authors:  Cécile Michel; Chantal Desdouets; Béatrice Sacre-Salem; Jean-Charles Gautier; Ruth Roberts; Eric Boitier
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 3.  The PPARα-dependent rodent liver tumor response is not relevant to humans: addressing misconceptions.

Authors:  J Christopher Corton; Jeffrey M Peters; James E Klaunig
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 4.  A reexamination of the PPAR-alpha activation mode of action as a basis for assessing human cancer risks of environmental contaminants.

Authors:  Kathryn Z Guyton; Weihsueh A Chiu; Thomas F Bateson; Jennifer Jinot; Cheryl Siegel Scott; Rebecca C Brown; Jane C Caldwell
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  The Role of NF-kappaB in PPARalpha-Mediated Hepatocarcinogenesis.

Authors:  Howard P Glauert; Karen Calfee-Mason; Yixin Li; Vani Nilakantan; Michelle L Twaroski; Job Tharappel; Brett T Spear
Journal:  PPAR Res       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 4.964

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.