Literature DB >> 8012351

Insert size and flanking haplotype in fragile X and normal populations: possible multiple origins for the fragile X mutation.

J N Macpherson1, H Bullman, S A Youings, P A Jacobs.   

Abstract

A number of recent studies have found non-random association between the fragile X mutation and genotypes for the closest-linked flanking markers, suggesting either a limited number of 'founder' mutations or, alternatively, a predisposing haplotype for the fragile X expansions. Using three microsatellite markers within 150 kb of FRAXA, we have compared haplotypes in a series of fragile X males and in a control population and find a markedly different distribution in the two samples, with apparently greater haplotype diversity in the fragile X sample. In the control sample, various non-random associations of CGG repeat numbers with flanking haplotypes were recorded which provide a clue to the likely origins of the fragile X mutation, suggesting more than one mechanism for the initial expansion event.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8012351     DOI: 10.1093/hmg/3.3.399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mol Genet        ISSN: 0964-6906            Impact factor:   6.150


  19 in total

1.  FMR1 haplotype analyses among Indians: a weak founder effect and other findings.

Authors:  Deepti Sharma; Meena Gupta; B K Thelma
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2002-12-14       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  FMR1 in global populations.

Authors:  C B Kunst; C Zerylnick; L Karickhoff; E Eichler; J Bullard; M Chalifoux; J J Holden; A Torroni; D L Nelson; S T Warren
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Positive fragile X microsatellite associations point to a common mechanism of dynamic mutation evolution.

Authors:  W T Brown; N Zhong; C Dobkin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Predisposition to the fragile X syndrome in Jews of Tunisian descent is due to the absence of AGG interruptions on a rare Mediterranean haplotype.

Authors:  T C Falik-Zaccai; E Shachak; M Yalon; Z Lis; Z Borochowitz; J N Macpherson; D L Nelson; E E Eichler
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  CGG repeats associated with DNA instability and chromosome fragility form structures that block DNA synthesis in vitro.

Authors:  K Usdin; K J Woodford
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1995-10-25       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  An n-allele model for progressive amplification in the FMR1 locus.

Authors:  A Morris; N E Morton; A Collins; J Macpherson; D Nelson; S Sherman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Unusual (CGG)n expansion and recombination in a family with fragile X and DiGeorge syndrome.

Authors:  J N Macpherson; G Curtis; J A Crolla; N Dennis; B Migeon; P K Grewal; M C Hirst; K E Davies; P A Jacobs
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  Expansion of the CGG repeat in fragile X in the FMR1 gene depends on the sex of the offspring.

Authors:  D Z Loesch; R Huggins; V Petrovic; H Slater
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Preparation and validation of the first WHO international genetic reference panel for Fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Malcolm Hawkins; Jennifer Boyle; Kathleen E Wright; Rob Elles; Simon C Ramsden; Anna O'Grady; Michael Sweeney; David E Barton; Trent Burgess; Melanie Moore; Chris Burns; Glyn Stacey; Elaine Gray; Paul Metcalfe; J Ross Hawkins
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Closely linked cis-acting modifier of expansion of the CGG repeat in high risk FMR1 haplotypes.

Authors:  S Ennis; A Murray; G Brightwell; N E Morton; P A Jacobs
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.878

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.