Literature DB >> 8010465

Does early administration of epidural analgesia affect obstetric outcome in nulliparous women who are receiving intravenous oxytocin?

D H Chestnut1, R D Vincent, J M McGrath, W W Choi, J N Bates.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some studies suggest that epidural analgesia prolongs labor and increases the incidence of cesarean section, especially if it is administered before 5 cm cervical dilation. The purpose of the current study was to determine whether early administration of epidural analgesia affects obstetric outcome in nulliparous women who are receiving intravenous oxytocin.
METHODS: Informed consent was obtained from healthy nulliparous women with a singleton fetus in a vertex presentation, who requested epidural analgesia while receiving intravenous oxytocin at at least 36 weeks' gestation. Each patient was randomized to receive either early or late epidural analgesia. Randomization occurred only after the following conditions were met: (1) the patient requested pain relief at that moment, (2) a lumbar epidural catheter had been placed, and (3) the cervix was at least 3 but less than 5 cm dilated. Patients in the early group immediately received epidural bupivacaine analgesia. Patients in the late group received 10 mg nalbuphine intravenously. Late-group patients did not receive epidural analgesia until they achieved a cervical dilation of at least 5 cm or until at least 1 h had elapsed after a second dose of nalbuphine.
RESULTS: Early administration of epidural analgesia did not prolong the interval between randomization and the diagnosis of complete cervical dilation, and it did not increase the incidence of malposition of the vertex at delivery. Also, early administration of epidural analgesia did not result in an increased incidence of cesarean section or instrumental vaginal delivery. Thirteen (18%) of 74 women in the early group and 14 (19%) of 75 women in the late group underwent cesarean section (relative risk for the early group 0.94; 95% confidence interval 0.48-1.84). Patients in the early group had lower pain scores between 30 and 120 min after randomization, and were more likely to experience transient hypotension. Infants in the late group had lower umbilical arterial and venous blood pH and higher umbilical arterial and venous blood carbon dioxide tension measurements at delivery.
CONCLUSIONS: Early administration of epidural analgesia did not prolong labor or increase the incidence of operative delivery, when compared with intravenous nalbuphine followed by late administration of epidural analgesia, in nulliparous women who were receiving intravenous oxytocin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8010465     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199406000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  11 in total

1.  Haemodynamic consequences and uterine contractions following 0.5 or 1.0 litre crystalloid infusion before obstetric epidural analgesia.

Authors:  J E Zamora; O P Rosaeg; M P Lindsay; M L Crossan
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 2.  [Recent standards in management of obstetric anesthesia].

Authors:  Maximiliaan van Erp; Clemens Ortner; Stefan Jochberger; Klaus Ulrich Klein
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2017-07-25

Review 3.  Controversies in obstetric anesthesia.

Authors:  Guilherme Holck; William Camann
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 4.  A Review of the Impact of Obstetric Anesthesia on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes.

Authors:  Grace Lim; Francesca L Facco; Naveen Nathan; Jonathan H Waters; Cynthia A Wong; Holger K Eltzschig
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Obstetrical anaesthesia in Ontario.

Authors:  K G Smedstad
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 6.  Labour analgesia. A risk-benefit analysis.

Authors:  R L Eberle; M C Norris
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Progress in analgesia for labor: focus on neuraxial blocks.

Authors:  J Sudharma Ranasinghe; David J Birnbach
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

Review 8.  Neuraxial analgesia effects on labour progression: facts, fallacies, uncertainties and the future.

Authors:  E N Grant; W Tao; M Craig; D McIntire; K Leveno
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 9.  Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Anthony J Kelly; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-10-07

10.  Advances in labor analgesia.

Authors:  Cynthia A Wong
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.