Literature DB >> 8713692

Labour analgesia. A risk-benefit analysis.

R L Eberle1, M C Norris.   

Abstract

The pain associated with labour can be severe. The ideal labour analgesic does not exist and systemic opioids provide little relief. Nausea, vomiting and sedation are common adverse effects of systemic opioids. Paracervical block can relieve only the pain of the first stage of labour. The duration of analgesia obtained using paracervical block is limited and repeat blocks increase the risk of direct fetal injection. Epidural analgesia effectively relieves labour pain. The insertion of an epidural catheter can provide continuous analgesia throughout labour. In addition, the catheter can be used to provide surgical anaesthesia, should operative delivery be required. Epidural local anaesthetics commonly produce maternal hypotension and motor blockade. However, opioids potentiate the effect of epidural local anaesthetics. Thus, concomitant epidural opioid injection allows the use of lower concentrations of local anaesthetics, decreasing the frequency and severity of hypotension and motor blockade. Epidural analgesia has other, potentially catastrophic, adverse effects but, with safe clinical practice, these problems are extremely rare. Intrathecal injection of opioids or local anaesthetics also effective labour analgesia. However, no single intrathecal drug or drug combination reliably provides analgesia for the duration of labour. Many clinicians use both intrathecal and epidural analgesia as a combined spinal-epidural technique. This approach provides the rapid onset of intrathecal drugs and the flexibility of continuous epidural block. Fetal heart rate decelerations occasionally follow the use of any of the above labour analgesic techniques. Most studies of the aetiology of fetal heart rate decelerations have focused on factors unique to each analgesic technique. However, the similar timing and appearance of fetal bradycardia suggests a common cause. Induction of maternal analgesia may transiently alter the balance between factors encouraging and inhibiting uterine contraction. A temporary increase in the uterotonic effects of endogenous or exogenous oxytocin may then produce a tetanic uterine contraction with subsequent decrease fetal oxygen delivery and resultant fetal bradycardia. Regardless of aetiology, these bradycardias are transient and should not produce maternal or fetal morbidity. Much controversy surrounds the effects of analgesia, especially epidural block, on the course and outcome of labour. Various studies have reported that epidural analgesia slows labour, increases the incidence of malposition of the fetal head, increases the need for forceps delivery and increases the risk of caesarean delivery. Most of the studies reporting these effects are retrospective and nonrandomised. More careful studies suggest that specific anaesthetic techniques (i.e. local anaesthetic-opioid mixtures) or obstetrical management can limit or eliminate these 'risks' of epidural labour analgesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8713692     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-199614040-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  77 in total

1.  Effect of epidural analgesia on the primary cesarean rate.

Authors:  R K Gribble; P R Meier
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Unintentional dural puncture and prophylactic epidural blood patch in obstetrics.

Authors:  P Colonna-Romano; B E Shapiro
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  The effects of the addition of sufentanil to 0.125% bupivacaine on the quality of analgesia during labor and on the incidence of instrumental deliveries.

Authors:  J D Vertommen; E Vandermeulen; H Van Aken; L Vaes; M Soetens; A Van Steenberge; P Mourisse; J Willaert; H Noorduin; H Devlieger
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Epidural block or parenteral pethidine as analgesic in labour; a randomized study concerning progress in labour and instrumental deliveries.

Authors:  T Philipsen; N H Jensen
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Fetal cardiac response to paracervical block anesthesia. II.

Authors:  R H Paul; R K Freeman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1972-07-01       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Respiratory arrest after second dose of intrathecal sufentanil.

Authors:  M N Baker; M C Sarna
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Respiratory depression after intrathecal sufentanil during labor.

Authors:  R L Hays; C M Palmer
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Uterine hyperactivity after intrathecal injection of fentanyl for analgesia during labor: a cause of fetal bradycardia?

Authors:  V T Clarke; R M Smiley; M Finster
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Extradural analgesia: the influence of volume and concentration of bupivacaine on the mode of delivery, analgesic efficacy and motor block.

Authors:  J Thorburn; D D Moir
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  A comparison of intrathecal, epidural, and intravenous sufentanil for labor analgesia.

Authors:  W R Camann; R A Denney; E D Holby; S Datta
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  5 in total

1.  Retrospective analysis of high-dose intrathecal morphine for analgesia after pelvic surgery.

Authors:  Annette Rebel; Paul Sloan; Michael Andrykowski
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 2.  Economic considerations related to providing adequate pain relief for women in labour: comparison of epidural and intravenous analgesia.

Authors:  Cecil Huang; Alex Macario
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour.

Authors:  Millicent Anim-Somuah; Rebecca Md Smyth; Allan M Cyna; Anna Cuthbert
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-21

4.  Elastic Abdominal Binders Reduce Cesarean Pain Postoperatively: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.

Authors:  Jamie L Gustafson; Fanglong Dong; Jennifer Duong; Zachary C Kuhlmann
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2018-05-18

5.  Effects of maternal epidural analgesia on the neonate--a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Bikash Shrestha; Amit Devgan; Mukti Sharma
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.638

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.