Literature DB >> 8008782

Stimulus congruence and the Simon effect.

M J O'Leary1, P J Barber.   

Abstract

A standard experimental procedure was implemented with novel response requirements to assess the hypothesis that the Simon effect is attributable not to the irrelevant stimulus-response relationship, but to the congruence between stimulus attributes. The stimulus ensemble consisted of the words LEFT and RIGHT, one of which was presented on each trial to the left or right of a central fixation point. The distinctive feature of the task is that subjects were asked to respond, by laterally placed keys, whether or not the stimulus word was in accord (i. e., congruent) with its location on the display. Asking subjects to judge stimulus congruence directly enables the effect of congruence to be assessed, as well as independent estimates of the two irrelevant S-R relationships that apply in the task--that is, between the response location and (1) the stimulus location (the Simon effect) and (2) the stimulus word (the reverse Simon effect). Marked effects were obtained in all three cases. Stimulus congruence remains in contention as a factor in the explanation of the Simon effect, but the strong effects of irrelevant S-R factors suggest that a more comprehensive account of the Simon effect is needed. An explanation in terms of stimulus salience, based on an interactive activational model, is briefly discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8008782     DOI: 10.1007/BF00419707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  16 in total

1.  Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing.

Authors:  J R Simon; A P Rudell
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1967-06

2.  Effect of conflicting cues on information processing: the 'Stroop effect' vs. the 'Simon effect'.

Authors:  J R Simon; K Berbaum
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1990-03

3.  Spatiel S-R compatibility effects involving kinesthetic cues.

Authors:  R J Wallace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1972-04

4.  S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code.

Authors:  R J Wallace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-06

5.  Verbal interference with encoding in a perceptual classification task.

Authors:  H S Hock; H Egeth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-02

6.  The Stroop test: selective attention to colours and words.

Authors:  A Treisman; S Fearnley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1969-05-03       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Effects of S-R mapping and response modality on performance in a Stroop Task.

Authors:  J R Simon; P Sudalaimuthu
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Interference effects in the Stroop and Simon paradigms.

Authors:  M J O'Leary; P J Barber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Theoretical interpretations of the speed and accuracy of positive and negative responses.

Authors:  R Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Toward a translational model of Stroop interference.

Authors:  R A Virzi; H E Egeth
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-07
View more
  2 in total

1.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.

Authors:  C H Lu; R W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06

2.  Processing irrelevant location information: practice and transfer effects in a Simon task.

Authors:  Dan B Welch; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.