Literature DB >> 8003958

Do salt bridges stabilize proteins? A continuum electrostatic analysis.

Z S Hendsch1, B Tidor.   

Abstract

The electrostatic contribution to the free energy of folding was calculated for 21 salt bridges in 9 protein X-ray crystal structures using a continuum electrostatic approach with the DELPHI computer-program package. The majority (17) were found to be electrostatically destabilizing; the average free energy change, which is analogous to mutation of salt bridging side chains to hydrophobic isosteres, was calculated to be 3.5 kcal/mol. This is fundamentally different from stability measurements using pKa shifts, which effectively measure the strength of a salt bridge relative to 1 or more charged hydrogen bonds. The calculated effect was due to a large, unfavorable desolvation contribution that was not fully compensated by favorable interactions within the salt bridge and between salt-bridge partners and other polar and charged groups in the folded protein. Some of the salt bridges were studied in further detail to determine the effect of the choice of values for atomic radii, internal protein dielectric constant, and ionic strength used in the calculations. Increased ionic strength resulted in little or no change in calculated stability for 3 of 4 salt bridges over a range of 0.1-0.9 M. The results suggest that mutation of salt bridges, particularly those that are buried, to "hydrophobic bridges" (that pack at least as well as wild type) can result in proteins with increased stability. Due to the large penalty for burying uncompensated ionizable groups, salt bridges could help to limit the number of low free energy conformations of a molecule or complex and thus play a role in determining specificity (i.e., the uniqueness of a protein fold or protein-ligand binding geometry).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8003958      PMCID: PMC2142793          DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560030206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  47 in total

1.  Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation.

Authors:  W KAUZMANN
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  1959

2.  Solvation energy in protein folding and binding.

Authors:  D Eisenberg; A D McLachlan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Jan 16-22       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A switch between two-, three-, and four-stranded coiled coils in GCN4 leucine zipper mutants.

Authors:  P B Harbury; T Zhang; P S Kim; T Alber
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-11-26       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  On the environment of ionizable groups in globular proteins.

Authors:  A A Rashin; B Honig
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1984-03-15       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features.

Authors:  W Kabsch; C Sander
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.505

6.  Ion-pairs in proteins.

Authors:  D J Barlow; J M Thornton
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1983-08-25       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  On the calculation of pKas in proteins.

Authors:  A S Yang; M R Gunner; R Sampogna; K Sharp; B Honig
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1993-03

8.  Refinement of the C222(1) crystal form of oxidized uteroglobin at 1.34 A resolution.

Authors:  I Morize; E Surcouf; M C Vaney; Y Epelboin; M Buehner; F Fridlansky; E Milgrom; J P Mornon
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1987-04-20       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Multiple-site titration and molecular modeling: two rapid methods for computing energies and forces for ionizable groups in proteins.

Authors:  M K Gilson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1993-03

10.  The pKa values of two histidine residues in human haemoglobin, the Bohr effect, and the dipole moments of alpha-helices.

Authors:  M F Perutz; A M Gronenborn; G M Clore; J H Fogg; D T Shih
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1985-06-05       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  173 in total

1.  Calculation of weak protein-protein interactions: the pH dependence of the second virial coefficient.

Authors:  A H Elcock; J A McCammon
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Optimization of binding electrostatics: charge complementarity in the barnase-barstar protein complex.

Authors:  L P Lee; B Tidor
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Tanford-Kirkwood electrostatics for protein modeling.

Authors:  J J Havranek; P B Harbury
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Role of Lys335 in the metastability and function of inhibitory serpins.

Authors:  H Im; M H Yu
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Electrostatic interactions in the GCN4 leucine zipper: substantial contributions arise from intramolecular interactions enhanced on binding.

Authors:  Z S Hendsch; B Tidor
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 6.  Breaking open a protein barrel.

Authors:  N Kallenbach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Contributions of distinct quaternary contacts to cooperative operator binding by Mnt repressor.

Authors:  A Berggrun; R T Sauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Molecular dynamics simulations of wild-type and mutant forms of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis MscL channel.

Authors:  D E Elmore; D A Dougherty
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Removal of surface charge-charge interactions from ubiquitin leaves the protein folded and very stable.

Authors:  Vakhtang V Loladze; George I Makhatadze
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  The Calpha ---H...O hydrogen bond: a determinant of stability and specificity in transmembrane helix interactions.

Authors:  A Senes; I Ubarretxena-Belandia; D M Engelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-31       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.