Literature DB >> 8003862

Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing modified radical mastectomy and extended radical mastectomy for stage II breast cancer.

T Morimoto1, Y Monden, S Takashima, S Itoh, T Kimura, H Yamamoto, M Kitamura, K Inui, N Tanaka, T Nagano.   

Abstract

A controlled cooperative study was carried out to assess the value of modified radical mastectomy for patients with stage II breast cancer. The data was analyzed from 11 institutions in the Shikoku District participating in a prospective clinical trial in which patients were randomly assigned either to a modified radical mastectomy group or an extended radical mastectomy group. These two groups of patients were similar to each other in terms of such background factors as age distribution, menopausal status, TNM classification, tumor size, location of the primary tumor, axillary nodal involvement, histological type, and estrogen receptor status. The median follow-up times in the modified and extended radical mastectomy groups were 4.7 and 4.5 years, respectively. The cumulative curves indicated no difference between the two groups in either disease-free survival or overall survival. The survival rates were classified according to the presence or absence of axillary nodal metastases. However, no significant difference was found between the two groups. These findings thus suggest that the routine removal of the grossly uninvolved major pectoral muscle and parasternal lymph nodes is not necessary in patients with stage II breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8003862     DOI: 10.1007/BF02032889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of radical mastectomy with alternative treatments for primary breast cancer. A first report of results from a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  B Fisher; E Montague; C Redmond; B Barton; D Borland; E R Fisher; M Deutsch; G Schwarz; R Margolese; W Donegan; H Volk; C Konvolinka; B Gardner; I Cohn; G Lesnick; A B Cruz; W Lawrence; T Nealon; H Butcher; R Lawton
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Radical mastectomy versus radical mastectomy plus internal mammary dissection. Ten year results of an international cooperative trial in breast cancer.

Authors:  J Lacour; M Le; E Caceres; T Koszarowski; U Veronesi; C Hill
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Prognosis of breast cancer patients after mastectomy and dissection of internal mammary nodes.

Authors:  U Veronesi; N Cascinelli; M Greco; R Bufalino; A Morabito; D Galluzzo; R Conti; R De Lellis; V Delle Donne; P Piotti
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  The general rules for clinical and pathological recording of breast cancer. Japanese Breast Cancer Society.

Authors: 
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1989-09

5.  Radical mastectomy versus radical mastectomy plus internal mammary dissection. Five-year results of an international cooperative study.

Authors:  J Lacour; P Bucalossi; E Cacers; G Jacobelli; T Koszarowski; M Le; C Rumeau-Rouquette; U Veronesi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Inefficacy of internal mammary nodes dissection in breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  U Veronesi; P Valagussa
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Surgical clinical trials.

Authors:  W L Donegan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Ten-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing radical mastectomy and total mastectomy with or without radiation.

Authors:  B Fisher; C Redmond; E R Fisher; M Bauer; N Wolmark; D L Wickerham; M Deutsch; E Montague; R Margolese; R Foster
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

  8 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Main controversies in breast cancer.

Authors:  Stephane Zervoudis; George Iatrakis; Eirini Tomara; Anastasia Bothou; George Papadopoulos; George Tsakiris
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

2.  How do I deal with the axilla in patients with a positive sentinel lymph node?

Authors:  Conrad B Falkson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2011-12

3.  Incidental irradiation of internal mammary lymph nodes in breast cancer: conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy versus conformal three-dimensional radiotherapy.

Authors:  Elton Trigo Teixeira Leite; Rafael Tsuneki Ugino; Marco Antônio Santana; Denis Vasconcelos Ferreira; Maurício Russo Lopes; Edilson Lopes Pelosi; João Luis Fernandes da Silva; Heloisa de Andrade Carvalho
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2016 May-Jun

4.  Radiotherapy of MRI-detected involved internal mammary lymph nodes in breast cancer.

Authors:  Sean Sachdev; Chelain R Goodman; Erin Neuschler; Kapila Kalakota; Daniel Cutright; Eric D Donnelly; John P Hayes; Adam E Prescott; Gianna Mirabelli; Jonathan B Strauss
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  The Metastatic Rate of Internal Mammary Lymph Nodes When Metastasis of Internal Mammary Lymph Node Is Suspected on PET/CT.

Authors:  Jung Eun Choi
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.588

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.