Literature DB >> 8001782

X-linked elements associated with negative segregation distortion in the SD system of Drosophila melanogaster.

Y Hiraizumi1, J M Albracht, B C Albracht.   

Abstract

Three elements, M1, M2 and M3, found in a special X chromosome, supp-X(SD), modify the degree and direction of segregation distortion in the SD system of Drosophila melanogaster. The first element, M1, is located between the y and the cv loci, probably close to the y locus. The second element, M2, is located near the cv locus and the third element, M3, is located between the y and the car loci. The M1 element appears to cause a relatively small amount of reduction in the rate of recovery of the SD-72, but not the cn bw, chromosome from SD-72/cn bw males, when raised at 27.5 degrees. The M2 and the M3 elements cause considerable decrease in the recovery rate of the SD-72 chromosome, whereas they increase the recovery rate of the cn bw chromosome. The amount of decrease is nearly the same as the amount of increase for each element. Some type of "switch" mechanism in the directions of distortion is suggested for each of these two elements and their effects appear to be approximately additive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8001782      PMCID: PMC1206126     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  14 in total

1.  Negative segregation distortion in the SD system of Drosophila melanogaster: a challenge to the concept of differential sensitivity of Rsp alleles.

Authors:  Y Hiraizumi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Meiotic Drive in Natural Populations of Drosophila Melanogaster. I. the Cytogenetic Basis of Segregation-Distortion.

Authors:  L Sandler; Y Hiraizumi; I Sandler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1959-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The effect of novel chromosome position and variable dose on the genetic behavior of the Responder (Rsp) element of the Segregation distorter (SD) system of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T W Lyttle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A possible case of negative segregation distortion in the SD system of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Y Hiraizumi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. IX. Suppressors of segregation distorter in wild populations.

Authors:  D L Hartl
Journal:  Can J Genet Cytol       Date:  1970-09

6.  Association between a satellite DNA sequence and the Responder of Segregation Distorter in D. melanogaster.

Authors:  C I Wu; T W Lyttle; M L Wu; G F Lin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-07-15       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  A Modified Model of Segregation Distortion in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  Y Hiraizumi; D W Martin; I A Eckstrand
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Temperature sensitivity of negative segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Y Hiraizumi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Dynamics of spermiogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Individualization process.

Authors:  K T Tokuyasu; W J Peacock; R W Hardy
Journal:  Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat       Date:  1972

10.  On the components of segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B Ganetzky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  4 in total

1.  Low frequency of mouse t haplotypes in wild populations is not explained by modifiers of meiotic drive.

Authors:  K G Ardlie; L M Silver
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  The selfish Segregation Distorter gene complex of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Amanda M Larracuente; Daven C Presgraves
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The organization and evolution of the Responder satellite in species of the Drosophila melanogaster group: dynamic evolution of a target of meiotic drive.

Authors:  Amanda M Larracuente
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  Unexpected patterns of segregation distortion at a selfish supergene in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta.

Authors:  Kenneth G Ross; DeWayne Shoemaker
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 2.797

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.