Literature DB >> 2116354

Negative segregation distortion in the SD system of Drosophila melanogaster: a challenge to the concept of differential sensitivity of Rsp alleles.

Y Hiraizumi1.   

Abstract

Current models of segregation distortion based on previous experimental results predict that, in the Sd heterozygous Rspi/Rsps male, the chromosome carrying the sensitive Rsps allele is distorted or transmitted in a frequency smaller than that of the expected Mendelian 0.5 relative to the chromosome carrying the insensitive Rspi allele. The present study presents a case where this does not occur, that is, when the genotype of the males is supp-X(SD)/Y; Sd E(SD)Rspi M(SD)+/Sd+ E(SD)+ Rsps M(SD)+ where supp-X(SD) is an X chromosome carrying a strong suppressor or suppressors of SD activity and SD+ E(SD)+ Rsps M(SD)+ is the standard cn bw chromosome. Following the "inseminated female transfer" procedure, young males of the above genotype carrying the standard-X instead of the supp-X(SD) chromosome show k values for the SD chromosome (frequencies of the SD chromosome recovered among progeny) of about 0.75, but with the supp-X(SD) chromosome, the k values are reduced to 0.36-0.41. Several possibilities other than the mechanism of segregation distortion to explain the reduced k values are ruled out. The occurrence of "negative segregation distortion" is clearly demonstrated, where the chromosome carrying the Rspi allele is distorted but the chromosome with the Rsps allele is not. This result requires a major modification of the current models or even a new model for the mechanism of segregation distortion to accommodate Rsp allele sensitivity or insensitivity. The present study also shows that males of the genotype, Sd Rspss M(SD)+/Sd+ Rspss M(SD), are almost completely sterile, but their fertility is considerably increased when SD activity is suppressed by the presence of the supp-X(SD) chromosome. This result suggests that the amount of the Sd product is not limited with respect to the interacting sites available, that is, the amount is large enough to interact with both of the Rspss alleles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2116354      PMCID: PMC1204079     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  14 in total

1.  Meiotic Drive in Natural Populations of Drosophila Melanogaster. I. the Cytogenetic Basis of Segregation-Distortion.

Authors:  L Sandler; Y Hiraizumi; I Sandler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1959-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Mechanisms of meiotic drive.

Authors:  S Zimmering; L Sandler; B Nicoletti
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 16.830

3.  Meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. IX. Suppressors of segregation distorter in wild populations.

Authors:  D L Hartl
Journal:  Can J Genet Cytol       Date:  1970-09

4.  Association between a satellite DNA sequence and the Responder of Segregation Distorter in D. melanogaster.

Authors:  C I Wu; T W Lyttle; M L Wu; G F Lin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-07-15       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Hybrid Dysgenesis in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER: A Syndrome of Aberrant Traits Including Mutation, Sterility and Male Recombination.

Authors:  M G Kidwell; J F Kidwell; J A Sved
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  A Modified Model of Segregation Distortion in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  Y Hiraizumi; D W Martin; I A Eckstrand
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Genetic dissection of segregation distortion. I. Suicide combinations of SD genes.

Authors:  D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  On the components of segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. III. Nature of enhancer of SD.

Authors:  J G Brittnacher; B Ganetzky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Dynamics of spermiogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Individualization process.

Authors:  K T Tokuyasu; W J Peacock; R W Hardy
Journal:  Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat       Date:  1972

10.  On the components of segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. IV. Construction and analysis of free duplications for the Responder locus.

Authors:  J G Brittnacher; B Ganetzky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  9 in total

1.  Yuichiro Hiraizumi and forty years of segregation distortion.

Authors:  B Ganetzky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Sex-specific meiotic drive and selection at an imprinted locus.

Authors:  Francisco Ubeda; David Haig
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Analysis of a Strong Suppressor of Segregation Distorter in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Rayla Greenberg Temin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Temperature sensitivity of negative segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Y Hiraizumi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  X-linked elements associated with negative segregation distortion in the SD system of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Y Hiraizumi; J M Albracht; B C Albracht
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  An empirical test of the meiotic drive models of hybrid sterility: sex-ratio data from hybrids between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila sechellia.

Authors:  N A Johnson; C I Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  The selfish Segregation Distorter gene complex of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Amanda M Larracuente; Daven C Presgraves
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Functional identification of the Segregation distorter locus of Drosophila melanogaster by germline transformation.

Authors:  J R McLean; C J Merrill; P A Powers; B Ganetzky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Unexpected patterns of segregation distortion at a selfish supergene in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta.

Authors:  Kenneth G Ross; DeWayne Shoemaker
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 2.797

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.