Literature DB >> 8000839

Iomeprol versus iopromide for intravenous urography.

P de Geeter1, H Melchior.   

Abstract

Iomeprol (B16880) is a new non-ionic tri-iodinated radiographic contrast medium. It was the aim of this double blind randomized phase III clinical trial to compare the local and systemic tolerance of iomeprol-300 (300 mg I ml-1) with the commercially available iopromide-300 (300 mg I ml-1) in a group of 198 patients needing intravenous urography. The contrast medium was injected rapidly into an antecubital vein within 2-3 min in most cases, using a standard dosage of 1 ml kg-1 body weight. The proportion of patients with an allergic diathesis was 25% in the iomeprol group and 17.3% in the iopromide group. There were no life-threatening adverse reactions. Eight patients (8%) receiving iomeprol and 6 (6.1%) receiving iopromide had a sensation of heat related to the injection of contrast medium. Only one patient (1%) in the iomeprol group and two patients (2%) in the iopromide group noted pain on injection. Although the incidence of all other side-effects was relatively high (7% after iomeprol and 11.2% after iopromide) these reactions were generally harmless. The most common symptom was nausea and/or vomiting, which occurred with the same incidence (5%) in both groups. Only one patient in each group developed urticaria or erythema. Vital parameters remained essentially unchanged in all patients. The results suggest that iomeprol is a safe contrast medium, with a tendency to produce fewer side effects than iopromide, which is known to be particularly well tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8000839     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-67-802-958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  5 in total

Review 1.  Iomeprol: a review of its use as a contrast medium.

Authors:  M Dooley; B Jarvis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Proteomic Analysis of Iodinated Contrast Agent-Induced Perturbation of Thyroid Iodide Uptake.

Authors:  Maha Hichri; Georges Vassaux; Jean-Marie Guigonis; Thierry Juhel; Fanny Graslin; Julien Guglielmi; Thierry Pourcher; Béatrice Cambien
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Nausea and vomiting after exposure to non-ionic contrast media: incidence and risk factors focusing on preparatory fasting.

Authors:  Yeon Soo Kim; Soon Ho Yoon; Young Hun Choi; Chang Min Park; Whal Lee; Jin Mo Goo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Are there any differences in acute adverse reactions among five low-osmolar non-ionic iodinated contrast media?

Authors:  Tatsuya Gomi; Masashi Nagamoto; Makoto Hasegawa; Asako Katoh; Miki Sugiyama; Nozomu Murata; Toshiyuki Kunihiro; Ehiichi Kohda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Preprocedural fasting for contrast-enhanced CT: when experience meets evidence.

Authors:  Heng Liu; Yu Liu; Li Zhao; Xue Li; Weiguo Zhang
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-12-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.