Literature DB >> 8000481

Cleveland health quality choice: a model for collaborative community-based outcomes assessment.

G E Rosenthal1, D L Harper.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cleveland Health Quality Choice Coalition was established in 1989 as a voluntary, collaborative effort between hospitals, physicians, and purchasers in the Cleveland metropolitan area to assess the quality and efficiency of care in 31 hospitals. The objective of the project is to produce high-fidelity comparative hospital outcomes data that support market-based health care reform strategies.
METHODS: The project reports on a broad spectrum of hospital outcomes, including patient satisfaction, in-hospital mortality, length of stay, hospital-acquired complications, and cesarean section rates for adult medical, surgical, obstetrical, and intensive care patients. Intensive care outcomes and patient satisfaction are assessed using previously validated measurement systems. Outcomes for medical, surgical, and obstetrical patients are examined using a standardized data collection and severity adjustment methodology developed by Cleveland physicians and an independent consultant.
RESULTS: The project released its initial report to purchasers in April 1993, with subsequent reports scheduled for release every six months. Several policies, procedures, and programs have been instituted to ensure data quality and participant buy-in. These include initial testing and rigorous validation of all outcomes measurement systems before release of data, a commitment to continuously refine risk-adjustment methodologies, independent auditing of data reliability, and a series of user-training workshops for project participants and local news media.
CONCLUSION: The early success of Cleveland Health Quality Choice Coalition demonstrates that it is possible for purchasers and providers to cooperatively assess the quality of health care on a regional basis and to institute a market-based strategy for health care reform. Further evaluation is needed to determine how performance data being reported are used by purchasers in selecting health care and by hospitals for quality improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8000481     DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30088-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv        ISSN: 1070-3241


  23 in total

1.  Relationships between in-hospital and 30-day standardized hospital mortality: implications for profiling hospitals.

Authors:  G E Rosenthal; D W Baker; D G Norris; L E Way; D L Harper; R J Snow
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Racial differences in the utilization of oral anticoagulant therapy in heart failure: a study of elderly hospitalized patients.

Authors:  S A Ibrahim; C K Kwoh; D L Harper; D W Baker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Using research to inform quality programmes.

Authors:  John Ovretveit; David Gustafson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-05

4.  Evaluation of quality improvement programmes.

Authors:  J Øvretveit; D Gustafson
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-09

5.  A regional evaluation of variation in low-severity hospital admissions.

Authors:  G E Rosenthal; D L Harper; A Shah; K E Covinsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Neonatal disease severity scoring systems.

Authors:  J S Dorling; D J Field; B Manktelow
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.747

7.  Risk adjusting cesarean delivery rates: a comparison of hospital profiles based on medical record and birth certificate data.

Authors:  D L DiGiuseppe; D C Aron; S M Payne; R J Snow; L Dierker; G E Rosenthal
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Racial variation in the use of do-not-resuscitate orders.

Authors:  L B Shepardson; H S Gordon; S A Ibrahim; D L Harper; G E Rosenthal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Reliability of birth certificate data: a multi-hospital comparison to medical records information.

Authors:  David L DiGiuseppe; David C Aron; Lorin Ranbom; Dwain L Harper; Gary E Rosenthal
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2002-09

10.  Are older patients more satisfied with hospital care than younger patients?

Authors:  C Komal Jaipaul; Gary E Rosenthal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.