Literature DB >> 8000264

Echocardiographic evaluation of anuloplasty rings. Comparison of continuity equation and pressure half-time methods.

S Wilansky1, S L Martin, C M Gaos, B S Jin, R J Hall, D A Cooley.   

Abstract

This study was undertaken to compare pressure half-time and continuity equation methods in the postoperative evaluation of anuloplasty rings. We performed 2-dimensional echocardiography and Doppler studies in 39 patients who had undergone valve repair for mitral regurgitation. In patients with a pressure half-time of 110 msec or more (9/39), there was no significant difference in calculated valve area between the 2 methods (p = 0.696). A significant difference was shown between the 2 methods (p < 0.001) in patients with a half-time less than 110 msec (30/39). When patients were classified according to the type of ring they had received, no significant difference was noted between the 2 groups with regard to peak and mean mitral gradients. In patients placed in subgroups according to half-times of less than 110 msec and half-times of 110 msec or more, no difference was noted between groups in terms of mean mitral gradient, presence of mitral regurgitation, left atrial size, left ventricular function, or heart rate. The continuity equation appears to provide much more homogeneous results in the calculation of valve area in patients who have undergone valvular repair for mitral valve regurgitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8000264      PMCID: PMC325163     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J        ISSN: 0730-2347


  5 in total

1.  A new, simplified and accurate method for determining ejection fraction with two-dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  M A Quinones; A D Waggoner; L A Reduto; J G Nelson; J B Young; W L Winters; L G Ribeiro; R R Miller
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Acute reduction of mitral valve area after percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty: assessment with Doppler continuity equation method.

Authors:  S Nakatani; S Nagata; S Beppu; F Ishikura; J Tamai; M Yamagishi; F Ohmori; K Kimura; M Takamiya; K Miyatake
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of ring mitral valvuloplasty for pure mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  J Kenny; L Cohn; R Shemin; J J Collins; M Plappert; M G Sutton
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1987-02-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Echocardiographic evaluation of Carpentier mitral valvuloplasty.

Authors:  I Kronzon; P Mercurio; H E Winer; S Colvin
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Doppler echocardiographic comparison of the Carpentier and Duran anuloplasty rings versus no ring after mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  B Unger-Graeber; R T Lee; M S Sutton; M Plappert; J J Collins; L H Cohn
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1991-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.