Literature DB >> 7998669

Objective measurements of compliance in asthma treatment.

F Chmelik1, A Doughty.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-management protocols and home peak expiratory flow rate monitoring are thought to improve asthma care.
OBJECTIVE: Compliance and accuracy of patients' record keeping were measured during a guided self-management protocol. Video, face-to-face instruction, and written protocols were part of the educational program.
METHODS: Twenty patients participated in a 5-week study using memory capable peak expiratory flow rate meters and inhalers. During the baseline week all patients followed their customary approach to treatment and kept written diaries of peak expiratory flow rate and inhaler usage results; thereafter, they followed an individually designed self-management protocol.
RESULTS: Good technique and knowledge were found during the baseline visit and improved by the last visit. Compliance with the protocol during the fifth week occurred in 40% of patients with underusage of inhalers in 50% and overusage in 10% despite allowing for a 10% inaccuracy in recording. Patients keeping inaccurate records early in care tend not to improve. Errors in recording inhaler usage increased from 47% to 58% of days during the final week. Patients inflated peak expiratory flow rate scores (P < .01) over time. Slight improvement in the peak expiratory flow rate was found for the entire group (baseline week 371 L/min versus final week 386 L/min P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite an extensive educational program in the self-management of asthma, compliance with recommended treatment was only 40%. Electronic monitoring of peak expiratory flow rate and inhaler usage can provide early identification of patients who do not comply.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7998669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Allergy        ISSN: 0003-4738


  11 in total

Review 1.  Rationale for once-daily therapy in asthma: compliance issues.

Authors:  M E Hyland
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  A randomized clinical trial of peak flow versus symptom monitoring in older adults with asthma.

Authors:  A Sonia Buist; William M Vollmer; Sandra R Wilson; E Ann Frazier; Arthur D Hayward
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Parents' interpretations of children's respiratory symptoms on video.

Authors:  R S Cane; S A McKenzie
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Daily diaries vs retrospective questionnaires to assess asthma control and therapeutic responses in asthma clinical trials: is participant burden worth the effort?

Authors:  Adesua Y Okupa; Christine A Sorkness; David T Mauger; Daniel J Jackson; Robert F Lemanske
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 5.  Obstructive sleep apnoea in the elderly: recognition and management considerations.

Authors:  Timothy G Quinnell; Ian E Smith
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  Evidence-based assessment of adherence to medical treatments in pediatric psychology.

Authors:  Alexandra L Quittner; Avani C Modi; Kathleen L Lemanek; Carolyn E Ievers-Landis; Michael A Rapoff
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2007-09-10

7.  Improved adherence with once-daily versus twice-daily dosing of mometasone furoate administered via a dry powder inhaler: a randomized open-label study.

Authors:  David Price; Anne Robertson; Kevin Bullen; Cynthia Rand; Rob Horne; Heribert Staudinger
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 3.317

8.  Nonadherence in difficult asthma - facts, myths, and a time to act.

Authors:  John T Lindsay; Liam G Heaney
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 2.711

9.  Computer-assisted school-based asthma management: a pilot study.

Authors:  Renée Jg Arnold; Jeanette A Stingone; Luz Claudio
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2012-11-13

10.  Quantifying data quality for clinical trials using electronic data capture.

Authors:  Meredith L Nahm; Carl F Pieper; Maureen M Cunningham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.