Literature DB >> 7996610

End-diastolic volume versus pulmonary artery wedge pressure in evaluating cardiac preload in trauma patients.

L Diebel1, R F Wilson, J Heins, H Larky, K Warsow, S Wilson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative accuracy of right ventricular end-diastolic volume index (RVEDVI) and pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) for determining cardiac preload.
METHODS: A modified pulmonary artery catheter was used to determine RVEDVI, PAWP, and CI 238 times in 32 trauma patients.
RESULTS: The initial mean values included cardiac index (CI) = 3.4 +/- 1.3 L/min/m2, PAWP = 14.8 +/- 6.6 mm Hg, and RVEDVI = 99 +/- 40 mL/m2. Cardiac index correlated better with RVEDVI (r = 0.6440; p < 0.001) than with PAWP (r = 0.1068) or CVP (r = 0.1604). In 84 studies in 19 patients, the PAWP was high (19+ mm Hg) in spite of an RVEDVI that was low (< 90 mL/m2) in 22 (26%) or mid-range (90-140 mL/m2) in 49 (58%) of these. In addition, in 12 studies a high RVEDVI (> 140 mL/m2) existed with a relatively low PAWP (< 12 mm Hg). Thus, in 83 (35%) of the studies, PAWP provided information different from the RVEDVI. Of 65 instances in which preload was increased, CI "responded" (> or = 20%) in 26 (40%). The incidence of a response was not affected by the PAWP; however, responses with a RVEDVI of < 90, 90-140, or > 140 mL/m2 were 64%, 27%, and 0 (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The RVEDVI more accurately predicted preload recruitable increases in CI than did the PAWP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7996610     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199412000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  15 in total

Review 1.  Fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a review of indices used in intensive care.

Authors:  Karim Bendjelid; Jacques-A Romand
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Methods of monitoring shock.

Authors:  Ednan K Bajwa; Atul Malhotra; B Taylor Thompson
Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.119

Review 3.  Interactions between respiration and systemic hemodynamics. Part II: practical implications in critical care.

Authors:  François Feihl; Alain F Broccard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Hemodynamic monitoring during liver transplantation: A state of the art review.

Authors:  Mona Rezai Rudnick; Lorenzo De Marchi; Jeffrey S Plotkin
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-06-08

Review 5.  Cardiopulmonary interactions and volume status assessment.

Authors:  Alain F Broccard
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Hemodynamic resuscitation in septic shock: cardiovascular support and adjunctive therapy.

Authors:  Brian M Fuller; R Phillip Dellinger
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 7.  [Assessment of volume responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients].

Authors:  D A Reuter; A E Goetz; K Peter
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  Monitoring in the intensive care.

Authors:  Eric Kipnis; Davinder Ramsingh; Maneesh Bhargava; Erhan Dincer; Maxime Cannesson; Alain Broccard; Benoit Vallet; Karim Bendjelid; Ronan Thibault
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2012-08-27

9.  Perioperative intravascular fluid assessment and monitoring: a narrative review of established and emerging techniques.

Authors:  Sumit Singh; Ware G Kuschner; Geoffrey Lighthall
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-07-12

10.  Cardiac filling volumes versus pressures for predicting fluid responsiveness after cardiovascular surgery: the role of systolic cardiac function.

Authors:  Ronald J Trof; Ibrahim Danad; Mikel W L Reilingh; Rose-Marieke B G E Breukers; A B Johan Groeneveld
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.