Literature DB >> 7996413

Ultrasound velocities for axial eye length measurement.

K J Hoffer1.   

Abstract

Since 1974, I have used individual sound velocities for each eye condition encountered for axial length measurement. The calculation results in 1,555 M/sec for the average phakic eye. A slower speed of 1,549 M/sec was found for an extremely long (30 mm) eye and a higher speed of 1,561 M/sec was noted for an extremely short (20 mm) eye. This inversely proportional velocity change can best be adjusted for by measuring the phakic eye at 1,532 M/sec and correcting the result by dividing the square of the measured axial length (AL1,532)2 by the difference of the measured axial length (AL1,532) minus 0.35 mm. A velocity of 1,534 M/sec was found for all aphakic eyes regardless of their length, and correction is clinically significant. The velocity of an eye containing a poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lens is not different from an average phakic eye but it does magnify the effect of axial length change. I recommend measuring the pseudophakic eye at 1,532 M/sec and adding to the result (AL1,532), + 0.04 + 44% of the IOL thickness. The speed for an eye with a silicone IOL was found to be 1,476 M/sec (or AL1,532 + 0.04 - 56% of IOL thickness) and for glass, 1,549 M/sec (or AL1,532 + 0.04 + 75% of IOL thickness). A speed of 1,139 M/sec was found for a phakic eye with silicone oil filling most of the vitreous cavity and 1,052 M/sec for an aphakic eye filled with oil. For varying volumes of oil, each eye should be calculated individually. The speed was 534 M/sec for phakic eyes filled with gas. Eyes containing a silicone IOL or oil or gas will create clinically significant errors (3 to 10 diopters) if the sound velocity is not corrected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7996413     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80237-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Ultrasound and computer assisted surgery (CAS) in orbit surgery].

Authors:  P A Federspil
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Accuracy and reliability of IOL master and A-scan immersion biometry in silicone oil-filled eyes.

Authors:  P Kunavisarut; P Poopattanakul; C Intarated; K Pathanapitoon
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Comparison of immersion ultrasound and low coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry in cataract patients.

Authors:  Yan Li; Hong-Xun Li; Yang-Chen Liu; Ya-Tu Guo; Jian-Min Gao; Bin Wu; Nan Zhang; Dong Liu; Xiao-Yong Yuan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Refractive outcomes of a single-step and a two-step approach for silicone oil removal and cataract surgery.

Authors:  V G Madanagopalan; Pradeep Susvar; M Arthi
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 5.  Intraocular lens power calculation formula in congenital cataracts: Are we using the correct formula for pediatric eyes?

Authors:  Savleen Kaur; Jaspreet Sukhija; Jagat Ram
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Clinical efficacy and complications of intraocular lens exchange for opacified intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Seung Mo Kim; Sangkyung Choi
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-12

7.  Microincision phacoemulsification combined with sutureless transpupillary passive silicone oil removal.

Authors:  Mithun Thulasidas; Hemlata Gupta; Mahipal S Sachdev; Avnindra Gupta; Lalit Verma; Sanchi Vohra
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 1.848

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.