Literature DB >> 7994955

Nonconstrained implants in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Y Takahashi1, R B Gustilo.   

Abstract

From March 1989 to March 1992, 39 knees were studied in 36 patients who had undergone revision total knee arthroplasty. A posterior stabilized modular prosthesis was used in 31 knees, and a standard condylar modular prosthesis was used in 8. Average followup was 20 months. The mean tibiofemoral angle was 2.1 degrees valgus (range, 22 degrees varus-23 degrees valgus) preoperatively, and 5.9 degrees valgus (range, 2 degrees varus-14 degrees valgus) postoperatively. Component placement in anteroposterior and lateral view was improved postoperatively. Postoperative patellar height was normal in 63.6% of the knees. Partial radiolucent lines were present in at least 1 prosthetic component in 72.7% of the knees, but no lines were complete. The Knee Society Pain Score improved from 50.5 points preoperatively to 82.7 points postoperatively. The Knee Society Function Score improved from 35.5 points to 56.1 points. Complications occurred in 20.5%. Since then, there has been 1 failure, an infection that subsequently led to knee fusion. Revision total knee arthroplasty presents difficult challenges, such as bone loss and ligamentous instability. A modular total knee replacement system allows the surgeon to do accurate preoperative planning and also to tackle unexpected problems intraoperatively. The authors' early results of revision total knee arthroplasty using a modular semiconstrained system are satisfactory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7994955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  5 in total

Review 1.  Fixation of revision TKA: a review of the literature.

Authors:  J Beckmann; C Lüring; R Springorum; F X Köck; J Grifka; M Tingart
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  [Diagnosis specific differences in knee joint geometry. A challenge for the correct axial implantation of long stems in total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  M Goebel; R Burgkart; L Gerdesmeyer; P Diehl; M Schmitt-Sody; W Plötz; R Gradinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Hybrid Cementation Technique Using the New Modular System for Aseptic Knee Arthroplasty Revision Surgery.

Authors:  Alessio Biazzo; Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Eric Staals; Francesco Masia; Francesco Verde
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2022-05

4.  Revision TKA with a condylar constrained prosthesis using metaphyseal and surface cementation: a minimum 6-year follow-up analysis.

Authors:  Pablo Sanz-Ruiz; Manuel Villanueva-Martínez; Jose Antonio Matas-Diez; Javier Vaquero-Martín
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  2- to 9-year outcome of stemmed total knee arthroplasty. Similar failure rates in patients when used primary or as a revision.

Authors:  Rüdiger J Weiss; Martin Thorsell; André Stark; Josefina Nyvang; Margareta Hedström
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.